My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2020 9:13:54 AM
Creation date
10/3/2012 10:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/28/1986
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIID-CONTINENT RESOURCES. INC. lip <br /> 201 Centennial St..Suite 406 <br /> Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 <br /> OW)945-4958 <br /> August 4 , 1986 <br /> RECEIVED <br /> Ms. Candace Thompson AUG 7 1%6 <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Division <br /> 423 Centennial Building MINED LAND <br /> 1313 Sherman Street RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Dear Candace: <br /> This letter is in answer to the questions that came up <br /> during my July 9th meeting with you and Jeff Deckler concerning <br /> reclamation cost calculations. Consideration is being given to <br /> Jeff' s memorandum of July 14 on these same questions. <br /> Verification of Disturbed Acreage <br /> We do not include the mine bench outslopes in our disturbed <br /> area calculations because Mid-Continent believes that they should <br /> be grandfathered. They were developed long before SMCRA and have <br /> not been utilized in the mining operations since the Federal and <br /> State rules implementing the SMCRA requirements were promulgated. <br /> A review of the first 22 pages of Chapter V, Reclamation, in <br /> Volume 7 of the permit application does not address the reclamation <br /> of the mine bench outslopes. This reclamation plan was approved <br /> by both MLRD and OSM in 1983. See page 48 of the August 1984 <br /> MLRD Findings Document. Despite the Mid-Continent grandfathering <br /> claim, the company agreed with MLRD (Bowman and Herron) to establish <br /> revegetation test plots on several of the mine bench outslopes <br /> and monitor them over a ten year period. See Volume 6, Section <br /> H, page 13 and Volume 7, Appendix V-G-1 for the ten year examination. <br /> In summary, Mid-Continent does not believe that it should be <br /> required to revegetate grandfathered areas and, accordingly, <br /> does not include the mine bench outslopes in the calculation of <br /> total disturbed area. <br /> Backfilling and Grading - AOC Requirements <br /> The major issue with respect to the backfilling and gradi#ig <br /> portion of the reclamation plan for Coal Basin is the AOC question. <br /> With a variance granted based on steep slope mining conditions, <br /> how much backfilling should realistically be required? Why is <br /> partial backfilling of all cut slopes necessary? In reviewing <br /> this issue with Doug Bowman, Mid-Continent' s Environmental Coordinator, <br /> and other Mid-Continent officials it was pointed out that the <br /> stipulations concerning stability analysis and testing of the <br /> mine benches and haul roads were not stipulations to the AOC <br /> approval, but rather to the reclamation plans for those areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.