My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2020 9:13:54 AM
Creation date
10/3/2012 10:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/28/1986
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br /> • MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES, INC. <br /> 201 Centennial St.,Suite 406 <br /> Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 <br /> (303)945-4958 <br /> November 26 , 1986 <br /> RECEIVED <br /> NOV 2 81986 <br /> Ms. Candace Thompson <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Division MINED LAND <br /> 423 Centennial Building RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Dear Candace: <br /> This is in reply to MLRD' s (Jeff Deckler' s) comments <br /> on reclamation cost calculations contained in his memorandum <br /> of October 16 , 1986 on the rock tunnel pad expansion, and in <br /> his letter of October 9 , 1986 on our June 30 and September <br /> 16 , 1986 calculations. <br /> Several of the MLRD comments were on items that we <br /> thought we had agreed upon previously, such as cost of <br /> removing conveyor systems, equipment correction factors , <br /> rock tunnel to preparation plant and preparation plant <br /> backfilling cost calculations , etc. At least they were not <br /> covered in your July 15th letter commenting on my June 30th <br /> calculations submission. Never-the-less, the following are <br /> Mid-Continent' s reply to each of the MLRD conunents. <br /> Rock Tunnel Pad Expansion Reclamation Costs <br /> Referring to Exhibit II-B-App. 3-6 in the Volume 2 <br /> maps notebook of the permit application you will see that <br /> the engineer' s estimated fill volume is listed as 9 ,900 cu. <br /> yds. MLRD' s contention that the volume appears to be miscalculated <br /> when considering the area of the cross-sections shown on <br /> that map is correct. Our re-calculations place it at 20 , 000 <br /> cu. yds instead of 9, 900 cu. yds . <br /> We do not agree with the MLRD finding that dozer <br /> production should be reduced to 440 of it' s rated work <br /> capacity at that relatively flat and easy-to-work location. <br /> The MLRD recommended dozer production capability would take <br /> a D-8 dozer 22 eight-hour days to push 22 , 000 cu. yds . an <br /> average distance of 400 feet. Contractors who work equipment <br /> here in the mountains utilize turbo charged diesel engines <br /> that perform close to rated capacities at these altitudes . <br /> In most areas of Coal Basin, with the highly trained and <br /> experienced operators that are locally available, dozers can <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.