My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (312)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (312)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 12:32:38 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 10:54:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ cc cc � l <br /> United States Forest PJeR RANGER DISTRICT <br /> Department of Service P.O. Box 1030 <br /> Agriculture (303) 527-4131 "� '1��hia� Ca1otira 81428 <br /> Reply To: 2820 <br /> Date: May 8, 1986 <br /> U.S. Department of Interior <br /> Office of Surface Mining <br /> ATTN: MELVIN SHILLING, Chief <br /> Mining Analysis Division <br /> 1020 15th Street <br /> Denver, CO 80202 <br /> Dear Mr. Shilling: <br /> Our memo to Mid-Continent (with carbon copy to OSM) dated 2/13/85 recommended <br /> extending the permit boundary beyond the lease boundary a sufficient distance <br /> to account for subsidence as determined by CMLRDIS recommended 20.50 angle of <br /> draw. The objective in this recommendation is to have possible subsidence <br /> covered under the Permit even though the area is outside the lease, thereby <br /> negating the need for additional permitting. <br /> We note in CMLRD'S Permit Revision 42 of February 1986 that "No new surface <br /> disturbance is included in this permit revision", and concur with the revision <br /> on that basis. <br /> I do note the existence of Mid-Continent's proposed rock tunnel on their <br /> application map. We have also received an unofficial proposal from <br /> Mid-Continent to construct 1.42 miles of new road to access anticipated methane <br /> gas wells. <br /> In view of these two anticipated activities, plus others which have been <br /> mentioned by Mid-Continent such as a tunnel portal, vent fans, and methane gas <br /> wells with possible gas lines, it might be prudent to include forseeable <br /> activities such as these in the overall Mine Plan Revision at this time. <br /> During recent scoping sessions, concern was expressed from several sources <br /> regarding a more long-range plan rather than a piece meal approach to <br /> development. Primary issues identified were: <br /> 1. Cumulative effects of roads and other probable development on the west side <br /> of Huntsman Ridge. <br /> 2. Maintaining non-motorized dispersed recreation. <br /> 3. Noise - especially regarding ventilation shafts. <br /> 4. Disturbance to wildlife - particularly deer and elk. <br /> w!S Fs•e400.2e17•e2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.