Laserfiche WebLink
No 4 293 84 -DATE 8-7-84 <br /> TO O}lt SOri Construction Co. ; then and associates inc. DAILYREPORT NO 5 SHEET 1 OF 1 <br /> 899 Ashley Road 4w, CONSULTING GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEERS SUBJECT FILL OBSERVATION d TESTING <br /> Craig, CO 81625 5080Rd 154 Mid Continent Embankment Compaction <br /> $DI(i FOUNDi1TI0N Glenwood Springs CO 81601 <br /> Attn: Budd Bower INGINIIRING Testing <br /> BG=Below Grade <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br /> DEPTH <br /> TEST LOCATION TEST OR MAXIMUMDRY MOISTURE COMPAC- SOIL TYPE <br /> NO TYPE ELEVATION DRY <br /> OMC DENSITY CONTENT TION <br /> II001) DENSITY 4%) (PC,) (XI (41 <br /> (PC9 <br /> 17C Pond #2, 80' N. of S. end of embankment N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 114.0 11.8 90 Clayey sandy gravel <br /> at centerline <br /> 20B� Pond #2, 10' N. of S. end of embankment, N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 114.4 15.2 0 <br /> , 10' W. of centerline r + <br /> 22 Pond #2, 50' N. of S. end of embankment, N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 116.9 13.1 92 " <br /> 15' W. of centerline <br /> 20C ' Pond #2, 10' N. of S. end of embankment, N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 114.9 14.9 1, J <br /> 110' W. of centerline <br /> 22A' Pond #2, 50' N. of S. end of embankment, N 14' BG 127.0 8. 7 116.8 14.3 <br /> ISI W. of centerline <br /> �23 ! Pond #2, 50' N. of S. end of dam, 5' W. of N 2' BG 127.0 8.7 120.7 11. 1 95 " <br /> icenterline <br /> 24 Pond #2, 100' N. of S. end of dam, 5' E. of N 2' BG 127.0 8.7 1130.8 9.9 100+ " <br /> centerline <br /> SPECIFICATION COMPACTION & MATERIAL 95% standard Proctor density )b In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as Indicated by <br /> test no.(s) 23, 24 <br /> IN In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as Indicated by <br /> dozer test no(s) 17C, 20B, 22, 20C, 22A and should be removed or reworked <br /> Type and number of earth moving units <br /> Type and number of compaction units <br /> Vib. roller ❑ Fill tested meets specifications <br /> 1 Number of passes thickness of lift Y7 Contractor advised <br /> Natural ❑ Full time observation f Part time observation <br /> Method of adding moisture PROGRESS REPORT Material was sampled for a check point <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of fill placement We have relied Proctor. Results indicate maximum dry density of <br /> on the contractor to continue applying the recommended cornpactive effort and moisture to the fill 127.0 pef and 8.7 0 optimum moisture remains applicable. <br /> durirng t,rnes when our observer Is not ohserving operations Tests are made of the fill only as <br /> beh,,ved necessary to calibrate our observers judgement Test data are not the sole basis for <br /> npinions on whether the fill meets Specifications <br /> cc: Mid Continent Resources <br /> Frank Quinn Hans Froeschle <br />