My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (317)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (317)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 12:39:52 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 9:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'08 NO 4 293 84 DATE -6-84 <br /> Johnson Construction Co. chen and associates, inc. 4 <br /> DAILY REPORT NO SHEET l OF 1 <br /> S99 Ashley Road , CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS <br /> SUBJECT FILL OBSERVATION & TESTING <br /> soaoRd 154 <br /> Craig, CO 81625 <br /> 50l(L FOUNDATIONGlenwood Springs co etsot Mid Continent Embankment Compaction <br /> Attn: Budd Bower ENGIN( ( NING Testing <br /> Y� <br /> BG=Below Grade <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br /> DEPTH <br /> TEST LOCATION TEST on MAXIMUM DRY MOISTURE COMPAC- SOIL TYPE <br /> NO TYPE ELEVATION DRY OMC DENSITY CONTENT TION <br /> (feet) DENSITY I%) (Pcf) 1%) Intl <br /> (Pcf) <br /> *21 125' N. of S. end of embankment, 10' E. of N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 113.2 16.5 89 Clayey sandy gravel <br /> *20A !10' N. of S. end of embankment, 10' W. of N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 116.1 13.6 91 " <br /> *1711180, N. of S. end of embankment at keyway N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 118.0 15.9 93� <br /> 'I.4 25 ' N. of S. end of embankment, 10' E. of N 14' BG 127.0 8.7 114.9 15.6 91 ;l <br /> I <br /> SPECIFICATION COMPACTION 3 MATERIAL 95 o standard Proctor density ❑ In our opinion. fill generally meets specifications as Indicated by <br /> test no(s)— <br /> D6 In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as Indicated by <br /> Type and number of earth moving units <br /> Dozer test no(s) 17B, 20A, 21A and should be removed or reworked <br /> Type and number of compaction units Vib. roller O Fill tested meets specifications <br /> Number of passes thickness of loft 1 )IQ Contractor advised <br /> Method of adding moisture Natural ❑ Full time observation IX Part time observation <br /> PROGRESS REPORT *Tests taken at embankment #2. Project <br /> This rnpOrt ,resr'nts opinions formed as a result of our Observation of fill placement We have retied engineer stated no soil investigation had previously <br /> on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill been performed. We recommended that an investigation <br /> rlurwo t rnr5 when our observer Is not observrnq operations Tests are made of the fill only as <br /> helievl•ri nt•c-P1,"ry to calibrate Our observer s judgement Test data are not the sole basis for should be conducted in order to provide design infor- <br /> ppininnS nn whether the fill meets specifications <br /> _ mation. <br /> cc: fetid Continent <br /> Frank Quinn Hans Froeschle <br /> OBSERVER APPROVED BY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.