Laserfiche WebLink
Jeffrey Clark <br />RMCC Combined SWSP - AMENDMENT <br />June 7, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />are not expected to hit the river. Additionally, the successful installation of the proposed slurry <br />wall will prevent the pit from refilling with ground water in the future. Therefore, it is assumed <br />lagged depletions will not result from the initial dewatering flow rate of 44.2 acre -feet per day. <br />Steady state dewatering will be required until the slurry wall is installed and disconnects <br />the site from the alluvial aquifer. Cell 3 is bounded to the north by cell 2 which is used by <br />RMCC as a silt pond, to the east by the three unmined parcels, to the south by North Tower Pit, <br />and to the west by the South Platte River. Due to the proximity of cell 3, it is expected the <br />majority of this dewatered volume will come from the unmined parcels to the east or from a near <br />direct connection to the river system to the west. Water pumped during this dewatering period <br />will be discharged directly to the river as well as into the unlined North Tower Pit to the south. <br />The North Tower Pit will act as a recharge basin with lagging parameters near identical to cell <br />3's dewatering activities. It is expected that the dewatering rate will reduce in correspondence <br />with the slurry wall construction progress. Any cone of depression created in the unmined <br />parcels to the east will be disconnected from the alluvial aquifer upon completion of the slurry <br />wall. The slurry wall is scheduled for completion by the end of 2012. For these reasons, it is <br />assumed that there will be no lagged depletions hitting the river once the dewatering operation <br />ceases. <br />Depletions <br />In addition to the new dewatering operations discussed above, RMCC is increasing its <br />mining production projection starting September 2012 from that originally projected in the <br />SWSP. Similar to the original SWSP although some mining will occur above the ground water <br />surface and some will occur below the ground water surface, to be conservative all projected <br />mining is assumed to be below the ground water surface and has been charged 4% water loss <br />by weight. Actual accounting will track where the mining occurs and only assess 2% water loss <br />by weight where mining is above the ground water surface. For September 2012 through July <br />2013, RMCC projects 1,340,000 tons of gravel projection at this site. This projects to a <br />maximum water loss of 39.4 acre -feet. <br />Due to the dewatering of cell 3 evaporative water Toss will be less than originally <br />projected in the SWSP. Table 1A shows the reduction of exposed ground water areas starting <br />at 121.5 acres in September 2012, tailing down to 53.6 acres by January 2013, and remaining <br />at 53.6 acres through the rest of the plan period. This amendment also increases the gross <br />evaporation rate from 43 inches per year to 44.5 inches per year to be consistent with the North <br />Tower engineering report revised on March 9, 2012. Using the previous effective precipitation <br />of 10 inches per year and historical North Tower Pit ET credit of 2.8 acre -feet per year, the <br />projected net evaporative Toss from September 2012 through July 2013 is 170.6 acre -feet <br />The total consumptive use at this site from September 2012 through July 2013 is 210.0 <br />acre -feet. These depletions do not hit the river instantaneously and thus must be lagged back <br />to the river. The IDS AWAS program was used to determine the lagging factors to be used at <br />the site. The input parameters are as follows: S, specific yield = 0.2; W, distance from the <br />stream to the alluvial boundary = 5,300 feet; T, transmissivity = 100,000 gallons per day per <br />foot; and X, distance from the centroid of the exposed ground water to the stream = 977 feet. <br />This analysis showed that over 95% of the first months consumptive use impacts the river within <br />the first 12 months. The depletions from this analysis were normalized to 100% over 12 months <br />in order to define the depletions factors for exposed ground water and mining depletions, as <br />shown in the following table: <br />