My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-19_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-09-19_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:08:17 PM
Creation date
9/19/2012 1:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/19/2012
Doc Name
PR-6 November 17, 2010 Hearing Transcript before the MLRB
From
Jeff Fugate - AGO
To
Sandy Brown, Marcia Talvitie, David Berry, John Roberts
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />allowed at this hearing? He said, No. He said that <br />they would have another opportunity for a hearing. <br />MR. PAULIN: Bruce. <br />MR. STOVER: Just to clarify. I'm <br />not an expert on all these rules, having been called <br />in here to be the prehearing conference officer. <br />I recall that what we were talking <br />about was when JoEllen was talking about we have <br />more objectors, my understanding is that I was set <br />up by the board for this particular objection, this <br />particular package. And whether or not another <br />person making another objection has the right to a <br />completely new different hearing on the same thing, <br />I did not know about that. <br />That being said, we did talk about <br />who would be allowed to speak, and so I went through <br />in detail and what a party to this process would <br />have to do, both the -- what their responsibilities <br />are and what their obligations would be. <br />And there were a lot of other people <br />on the phone listening to this, and we only had <br />three people -- you know, three parties that stepped <br />forward. So anybody who was listening in or anybody <br />who wanted to be party to this particular hearing <br />had that opportunity on that conference call. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.