Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />r <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 permit revision, Richard Weimer's ranch, Carvers, <br />2 Coopers, all of them, and they filed it in the <br />3 length of time that it was necessary, and it was <br />4 filed, and it asked for a formal hearing. <br />5 MR. FUGATE: The point I'm making is <br />6 whether or not they did file a request that <br />7 classified them as parties and requested another <br />8 formal hearing, it's not a second hearing request. <br />9 What they're requesting to <br />10 participate in at that time was already a scheduled <br />11 hearing. The coal regs are written such that that <br />12 initial objection triggers the 30 -day hearing <br />13 process. We held a hearing, which then set it for <br />14 today's date. <br />15 Any objection letters, comment <br />16 .etters, requests for hearing submitted subsequent <br />17 to that, they're all -- they're all combined into <br />18 this hearing. We can't have a series of hearings <br />19 based on every -- every request that we receive, and <br />20 it's not how the coal act is set up. <br />21 MS. TURNER: That is not what Bruce <br />22 Stover said. I specifically told him, we have 35 <br />23 other people that -- the public comment period did <br />24 not end until November 15, and he told me -- I said, <br />25 What about all these other people here? Are they <br />