Laserfiche WebLink
Golden Eagle: No Golden eagles nest sites are located on or near the property, though <br />some Wyoming groundsquirrels do inhabit the Phase 2 site. These are a key prey species <br />for Golden eagles in the Piceance Basin, so gravel pit operations could have an effect on <br />the local groundsquirrel population. However, this is an abundant prey species <br />distributed widely in the region, so a small local reduction in population is extremely <br />unlikely to have an affect on golden eagle populations. <br />Prairie Falcon: There are no suitable cliffs or nesting sites on or near the property, so <br />gravel pit operations should have no affect to this species. <br />Bald Eagle: The nearest identified winter roosts are located approximately 1 mile <br />upstream and 1.75 miles downstream of the Phase 2 project area. Both roost sites are <br />located on private property. There are no known nesting sites within 1 mile of the project <br />area and the riparian corridor will remain unaffected by the proposed project. Therefore <br />there should be no affect to this species. <br />Northern Harrier: The Phase 2 site contains no suitable habitat for this species and the <br />adjacent riparian zone will not be impacted by the project. Therefore there will be no <br />affect to this species. <br />Northern Goshawk: The Phase 2 site contains no suitable habitat for this species and the <br />adjacent riparian zone will not be impacted by the project. Therefore there will be no <br />affect to this species. <br />TESS Fish <br />Affected Environment: The project is adjacent to the White River and its 100 -year <br />floodplain, which floodplain is designated as critical habitat for the Colorado pike - <br />minnow, though the habitat in this region is presently unoccupied. The USFWS has <br />concerns that water depletions in the White River basin could impact other endangered <br />fish species as well. These include the Humpback chub, Razorback sucker and the <br />Bonytail. Further, stormwater runoff and potential sedimentation is always a concern <br />related to fisheries habitats, and the proximity of earthmoving- operations in this case <br />warrants attention. <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: TESS Fish <br />Since this project will actually utilize less water resources than are currently diverted for <br />agricultural production on the property, water depletions in the basin will not be an issue <br />and therefore there will be no affect to any endangered fish species. <br />With regard to stormwater runoff and potential sedimentation, the site will have an <br />approved stormwater management plan and be under permit authority from the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and Environment, which agency has regulatory authority to <br />ensure no sedimentation will occur to State waters. Please refer to Section 3.2 Water <br />Quality for a detailed discussion regarding stormwater management. <br />Environmental Solutions, Inc. Page 17 of 30 March 09 <br />