My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-30_HYDROLOGY - C2009087 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2012-08-30_HYDROLOGY - C2009087 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:07:12 PM
Creation date
8/31/2012 10:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
8/30/2012
Doc Name
2nd Quarter 2012 DMRS (CO-0048275)
From
Pebody Sage Creek Mining, LLC
To
WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
DMR’s
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Z Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC <br />L94979 -01 WG324040 Nitrate / Nitnte as N, dissolved <br />Nitnte as N, dissolved <br />WG324502 Nitrogen, ammonia <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG324097 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG324100 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />WG324055 Sulfide as S <br />L94979 -02 WG324040 Nitrate / Nitnte as N, dissolved <br />Nitnte as N, dissolved <br />WG324502 Nitrogen, ammonia <br />WG324097 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG324100 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />WG324344 Sulfate <br />WG324055 Sulfide as S <br />L94979 -03 WG324097 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG324100 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />L94979 -04 WG324022 Selenium, potentially dissolved <br />WG324097 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />SM2540C <br />WG324100 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M350.1 - Automated Phenate <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M350.1 - Automated Phenate <br />D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />D516 -02 - Turbidimetnc <br />D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />SM4500S2 -D <br />M200.8 ICP -MS <br />ACZ Project ID: L94979 <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />QD Reported value is the background - corrected concentration, <br />as described by the method. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matnx spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />QD Reported value is the background - corrected concentration, <br />as described by the method. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />ZO Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.