My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2012-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 10:47:27 AM
Creation date
8/29/2012 12:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/10/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION II.E & II.F Climatology Report & Vegetaton Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ERO Resources <br />trees. Arnold (1964) and Johnson 11980) reinforce these findings. <br />• Arnold's findings show that western wheatgrass lAaraovran gmj~ij) is <br />affected to a lesser degree than other perennial greases. Jaeason alco <br />reports tI970) that juniper roots compete effectively with grasses, such <br />as blue gramagrasa (fioutalaua araoilis) and galleta (Hilaria jam9.ti.Li.). On <br />the permit area, the presence but infrequency of both these grasses <br />suggests this and allelochemical effects have reduced the abundance and <br />distribution of these species. Clary and Jameson (19811 report forage <br />increased from 46 to 731 after removal of the overstory. <br />Tueller and Clark (1975) report on the other ecological effects created by <br />juniper. These authors write that individual woodland trees irfi (bit both <br />light and moisture interception at the surface, suggesting that <br />approximately 40X of the effective rainfall and 80X of the light are <br />intercepted by the canopy. <br />Costello (1944) reports on conditions that are indicative of increasing or <br />decreasing aspects of the sagebrush and juniper woodland communities. <br />• Costello states that declining and unsatisfactory conditions in the <br />sagebrush types are indicated when the important grasses, such as blue <br />gramagrass, western wheatgrass, fescue (Festuca spp.) and needle-and- <br />thread lStToa O,Q~a), survive only under clumps of sagebrush and weedy <br />species become predominant. Young et at. 11979) further state that <br />wildfire or other disturbance that removes the shrub overstory will result <br />in complete invasion by weedy species, particularly cheatgrass. Weedy <br />species listed include aster IMachaeranthera linearis), eanciwort (ACSAdLia <br />eastwnodiea), knotweed IErieann,m corvmbesum) and fleabane daisy (Eriyeron <br />spp.). With increasing deterioration, the larger weedy fortis decline. <br />Subsequently sheet and gully erosion also may result in areas of barren <br />grourW. <br />The presence of blue gramagrass in woodlands is an indicator of good range <br />conditions, according to Costello. The absence or infrequence of this <br />grass is an indicator of decline. The presence of squirreltail grass <br />tSitanion hvstrixl in these areas is also an indicator of general decline, <br /> <br />II.F-I5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.