2012-08-21_REVISION - M1980244 ‎(32)‎

• Permit No: M1980244
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 8/21/2012
• Doc Name: APPLICATION RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW
• From: CC&V
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: AM10
• Email Name: TC1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

MSID or
Other ID
No.
Checked as Within
200' of Boundary in
Exh. 0
Appears Within 200'
of Boundary on Exh.
C -1
Exhibit 0 Name of Addressee
9084
No
YES
Everhart. Jack F
8244
No
YES
Fay, W 0 ...
9878
No
YES
Abbott, Melvin
9345
No
YES
James, Richard K
9693
No
YES
James, Richard K
10014
No
YES
Kirkpatrick, Ed ...
10428
No
YES
Mar Holdings
13650
No
YES
Marston, Thaleia ...
9878
No
YES
Abbott, Melvin
10262
No
YES
El Paso Gold Mines Inc
10800
No
YES
Shiloh Plain Inc
9249
No
YES
Wagner, Nicholas A
9665
No
YES
Wallace, John Jacob
RESPONSE: This was an oversight on CC &V's part within the application. All MSIDs as noted were
reviewed by CC &V and a revised Exhibit O is included as Attachment 3. All property owners, as noted,
received `Notices" and are noted as within 200' ofpermit boundary on revised Exhibit O in Attachment 3.
6.4.20 EXHIBIT T — Permanent Man -made Structures
30. Owners of land within 200 feet — Pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(g), the Applicant must provide proof of notice
to: a) all Owners of Record of the surface and mineral rights of the affected land, and b) the Owners of
Record of all land surface within 200 feet of the boundary of the affected lands. The "OMLR Compliance
List" at the beginning of the Application (reference page 2, Rule 1.6.2(1)(g)) states proof of notices will be
submitted upon receipt of return receipts. The Division has not received these proofs of notice. Please
provide copies of the return receipts.
RESPONSE: Pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)0, CC &V provided proof of notice to: a) all Owners of Record of
the surface and mineral rights of the affected land, and b) the Owners of Record of all land surface within 200
feet of the boundary of the affected lands. The "OAMR Compliance List" at the beginning of the Application
(reference page 2, Rule 1. 6.2(1)0) states proof of notices will be submitted upon receipt of return receipts.
CC &V historically has provided all proof of notices at one time. CC &V provides copies of the Return
Receipts in Attachment 7.
31. Proposed North Cresson Blasting-- The letter from Matheson Mining Consultants (reference Appendix 5,
Volume III) notes the ongoing blasting and monitoring programs demonstrates compliance with blast
vibration regulations and precludes damage to sensitive structural elements in homes including historically
significant structures. Given the proximity of proposed blasting in the North Cresson (Globe Hill and Schist
Island) to the Mollie Kathleen Tourist Mine, the Division is concerned about the effects blasting may have on
the Mollie Kathleen underground workings, mine operators and tourists. Please provide the Division
assurance that the underground workings and the safety of people in those workings have been considered in
the blasting analysis.
RESPONSE. As noted above, safety of CC &V workers and the public are of the upmost concern to CC &V.
Blast effects will be measured in a conservative manner. Measurement of blast effects on the surface will
provide a record of compliance with permit obligations. Current ground vibration criteria that precludes
damage to residential and historically significant structures is approximately an order of magnitude lower
than ground vibration criteria typically used in underground blasting to preclude rockfall. CC &V intends to
measure all blasting. CC& V has had discussions with the owners of the Mollie Kathleen tourist mine and all
parties are comfortable in application of the ground vibration criteria set forth in the current CC &V permit.
No adverse effect is anticipated; should any occur CC &V will take immediate steps to mitigate the hazard.