Laserfiche WebLink
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Western Fuels New Horizon Mine <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />QUAL DESCRIPTION <br />L86882 - 01 WG298380 Sodium, dissolved <br />WG298312 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG298605 Nitrogen, ammonia <br />WG298314 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M200.7 ICP <br />WG298409 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />WG298687 Sulfate <br />WG298313 Sulfide as S <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M350.1 - Automated Phenate <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />376.2 - Methylene Blue <br />WG298410 Total Alkalinity SM2320B - Titration <br />BB <br />HE <br />RA <br />HE <br />RA <br />RA <br />HE <br />RA <br />M3 <br />RA <br />RA <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L86882 <br />Target analyte detected in calibration blank at or above <br />acceptance limit. Sample value was > 10X the <br />concentration in the calibration blank. <br />Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte <br />concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike <br />level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS <br />or LFB) was acceptable. <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />