My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089A
>
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:01:22 PM
Creation date
8/23/2012 1:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/20/2012
Doc Name
Hydrology Description
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The springs in the toe area of the old Peabody backfill have a calcium magnesium sulfate type <br />water quality with average TDS of around 3650 mg/1 and a pH of about 7.0 that varies little from <br />irrigation season to non - irrigation season. This water quality is better than that of the coal zone <br />and probably reflects a blend of waters from the OB, Coal, and UB zones. In contrast, the spring <br />in the high -wall, although being of a similar calcium magnesium sulfate type had a TDS of about <br />1660 mg/1 and an average pH of about 7.5. <br />Irrigation run off produces areas of wetlands in low spots in the NHN permit area that dry out <br />during the winter months. While these areas appear to be seeps they are totally dependent on <br />ditch irrigation and would not exist without it. The spoil springs are still flowing and monitoring <br />will resume after the permit has been approved and prior to mine development. There are no <br />naturally occurring springs within the New Horizon North permit boundary. <br />Present Ground Water Use Records of the State Engineers Office of the Division of Water <br />Resources of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources were reviewed to determine the <br />number and location of water wells that have been constructed (drilled) within a one (1) mile <br />radius of the NHN proposed permit boundary. Thirty three (33) wells were identified and are <br />located as shown on Map 2.04.7 -8. Table 2.04.7 -4 is a list of these wells showing the permit <br />numbers, locations, depth, yield, static water level, well owner or applicant and the suspected <br />aquifer zone in which each well has been completed. Three of these "wells" are water <br />monitoring holes that were constructed by Peabody (in the Dakota Formation) and transferred <br />(through the State Engineers Office) to Montrose County for their landfill. Some of the well <br />locations reflect permit applications and are not necessarily constructed wells as some of the <br />"well construction reports" were not available. Wells without construction details are identified <br />on Table 2.04.7 -4 as they are missing depth, yield and static water level information. Some of <br />the well information reviewed listed the formation or aquifer the wells were completed in while <br />some did not. Table 2.04.7 -4 reports actual data where it could be found. None of the wells <br />within a one mile radius of the NHN permit boundary draws its water from the Dakota <br />Formation, LDx overburden, coal, or under - burden zones. The most prolific aquifer in the area <br />is the Brushy Basin Member of the underlying Morrison Formation, which is the uppermost <br />sandstone of that formation. The Brushy Basin Member is well isolated from the Ldx <br />overburden, coal, and under - burden zones by tight siltstone and shale of the lower Dakota <br />Formation and mudstone of the Burro Canyon Formation. <br />Potential Ground Water Use The overburden, coal, and under- burden zones in the NHN permit <br />area are unsuitable for domestic drinking water and crop irrigation. The overburden and under - <br />burden zones, in most cases however, would be marginal for livestock, while the coal zone <br />would not. Low permeability, cyclic water levels, and resulting low well yields greatly reduce <br />any potential use of water from the three strata (OB, Coal, UB). <br />Section 2.04.7 Page 11 November 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.