My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983-10-07_INSPECTION - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1983-10-07_INSPECTION - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2020 4:28:56 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 12:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
10/7/1983
Doc Name
Report Recommendations
From
Standard Metals Corp.
To
MLRD
Inspection Date
8/30/1983
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' STANDARD METALS CORPORATION <br /> P.O. Box 247 <br /> Silverton, Colorado 81433 <br /> (303) 387-5533 <br /> pabb '_417 1gQ3 <br /> Mr. Mike Stanton <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division , <br /> 423 Centennial Building <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver Colorado 80220 <br /> d <br /> Re: August 30, 1983, Inspection Report <br /> ,,,,Pile No. 77-378 <br /> Dear Mike: <br /> On August 30, 1933, I accompanied Division personnel , Messrs Loye <br /> and Beavers , on an inspection of our Silverton facilities and related <br /> reclamation activities. On September 15, I received a copy of the <br /> ensuant inspection report summarizing results of the site visit, which <br /> denoted the existence of possible violations of the mining permit <br /> issued for the Silverton operation. Since no permit violations were <br /> discussed during the site inspection, the inspection report as received <br /> was unanticipated. However, in accordance with replication stipulations <br /> of the inspection report, I have submitted all pertinent information re- <br /> garding activities implemented to achieve compliance with report recom- <br /> mendations, specifically: <br /> Report Recommendations --- <br /> 1. Revegetation work should be continued and expanded in scope as soon <br /> as possible. <br /> Reclamation procedures employed on disturbed acreages at the Silverton <br /> site have been and will continue to be effected with expedience. We <br /> believe reclamation efforts and resultant success achieved to date to- <br /> ward attaining reclamation goals to be above expectations when the number <br /> of intrinsic and extrinsic factors limiting success are considered (i .e. , <br /> climate, species diversity, substrate composition) . Plans for expanding <br /> successful reclamation procedures to additional affected acreages are in <br /> progress; however, we are continually refining reclamation methods em- <br /> ployed on disturbed sites , particularly abandoned mill tailings deposition <br /> sites. Consequently, we feel that a slower controlled rate of reclama- <br /> tion practice expansion to be more beneficial , both technically and eco- <br /> nomically, toward achieving reclamation goals. For example, a revegeta- <br /> tion planting failure is easier to diagnose over a smaller area than a <br /> large tract. Once confidence is gained in a successful reclamation pro- <br /> cedure for a disturbance type (i .e. , tailing, waste rock) , we will attempt <br /> to effect expanded reclamation on these sites as soon as possible. This <br /> practice has already been implemented on certain minor disturbance areas <br /> requiring less intensive reclamation procedures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.