My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-08-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981038
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
1981-08-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2020 8:56:39 AM
Creation date
8/8/2012 9:04:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/20/1981
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Colorado Westmoreland, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
BFB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Relationship to Other Planning in the Area <br /> Interrelationships with other plans and agencies with jurisdiction <br /> have been discussed in Chapter One, "Interrelationships" of TE/EAR <br /> CO-030-9-34. "Authorizing Actions" are also covered in that chapter. <br /> The proposed increase in production from CWI' s Orchard Valley Mine <br /> would be compatible with existing land use plans in the area. It would <br /> be consistent with the multiple use objectives for coal leasing in the <br /> North Fork Planning Unit as set forth in BLM' s Management Framework Plan <br /> (MFP) for the unit- (completed April 26, 1974, and updated September 8, <br /> 1977). <br /> With the issuance of the Federal Coal Management Regulations, <br /> limitations on production were lifted, and CWI became eligible for <br /> increased production under the new regulations. <br /> The increase in production from 700,000 tons per year to 1.3 <br /> million tons per year would have no significant cumulative impacts to <br /> Delta-County. Current and anticipated coal production from the North <br /> Fork Valley as analyzed in the FWCCCES (p. 24-28) is occurring at lower <br /> than the "mid-level production" curve (p. 26) that predicted production. <br /> The increase would contribute to cumulative environmental impacts in the <br /> North Fork Valley environment. <br /> Energy Requirement and Conservation Potential of the Various Alternatives <br /> This section consists of two tables, Table 5 and Table 6, which <br /> show energy use in common units and BTU equivalents for the two alter- <br /> natives. A short discussion of energy conservation potential exists at <br /> the end of this section. <br /> One area of improvement in energy efficiency of the CWI Orchard <br /> Valley operation (apparent from the two tables) would be employee's <br /> travel gasoline usage. This could be reduced by an increased emphasis <br /> on car-pooling and a possible shuttle bus service. This has been <br /> discussed by BLM with CWI officials. They have stated that employees <br /> are encouraged to car-pool whenever possible. They have stated that <br /> they are investigating increased incentives for car-pooling, and the <br /> long-range possibility of some sort of employer-supplied transportation <br /> using buses. <br /> If the conveyor were to be constructed, the diesel fuel required <br /> for the trucks would not be used. <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.