My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-30_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2012-07-30_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:04:21 PM
Creation date
8/6/2012 1:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/30/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
site knowledge generated this justification in March of 2009. Based on this <br />justification, the initiation of a groundwater point of compliance for the <br />existing operations is not warranted. <br />2. Discrepancies with Areas <br />COAL <br />COMPANY � <br />O �'ss.rsoaaces ' <br />There are some discrepancies between the amount of acres in the RN -06 <br />application (page 3) and values in the Division's Permit System (see decision <br />form for TR -94). Please work with the Division to resolve the following: <br />a. Surface Ownership (Federal) — is the correct value 2,373 acres or 2,290.19 <br />acres? <br />Response: In response to this comment Colowyo recalculated this acreage <br />several different times and believes 2283.7 acres is the correct number for <br />surface ownership of federal lands within the permit boundary. <br />b. Surface Ownership (Private) — is the correct value 9,238 acres or 9,320.76 <br />acres? <br />Response: In response to this comment Colowyo recalculated this acreage <br />several different times and believes 9327.2 acres is the correct number for <br />surface ownership of private lands within the permit boundary. <br />c. Disturbed Area — is the correct value 4,800.6 acres or 4,766.3 acres? <br />Response: Colowyo believes 4800.6 acres is the correct value for the current <br />disturbed area. Colowyo also reported this number in the 2011 Annual <br />Report. <br />3. Reclamation Plan <br />a. Regarding the new Table 2.03 -1 submitted with RN -06, please explain why <br />there is much more reclaimed area than disturbed area in the total row at <br />the bottom of the table. <br />Response: An additional row with supplementary years (2018 -2021) was <br />added to Table 2.03 -1 which added 1,451 acres. This additional acreage, <br />plus a large reduction in the disturbed acres between the West Pit and South <br />Taylor, accounts for larger blocks of reclaimed acreage for the next permit <br />term. <br />A Western Fuels - Colorado, LLC mining property <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.