My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-16_HYDROLOGY - M2011001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2011001
>
2012-07-16_HYDROLOGY - M2011001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:03:28 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 12:29:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011001
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/16/2012
Doc Name
COMBINED SUBSTITUTE WATTER SUPPLY PLAN
From
DWR
To
BISHOP-BROGDEN ASSOCIATES
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 2 <br />Martin Marietta Materials <br />35th Avenue Pit <br />2012 -2013 Projected Depletions <br />Prndncthnn Denlethnns <br />Notes: <br />(1) Equal to the maximum exposed post -1981 surface area <br />(2) Equal to Column (6) of Table 1 <br />(3) Equal to (1) x (2). <br />(4) Evaporative depletions in (3) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the parameters below Note that lagged evaporative depletions include depletions lagged from the previous SWSP periods (pr <br />Transmissrvity 120,000 gallons /day /foot <br />Specific Yield 0.2 <br />Aquifer Width. 5,000 feet <br />Distance from center of pits to river. 1,500 feet <br />(5) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM). Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not exceeded <br />(6) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from MMM Water removed with mined aggregate equals 9.6 gallons/ton (4% of total mined volume) as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120. <br />Therefore, (10) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9.6 gallons/ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre -feet <br />(7) Projected future dust suppression at the 35th Avenue Site and Iverson comes from the 35th Avenue Site and is based upon information from MMM Note that dust suppression in July, August, September, and October will <br />come from the Iverson Pit through the dewatering process (see Table 4) <br />(8) Projected future concrete production at the 35th Avenue batch plant is based upon information from MMM <br />(9) Equal to (6) + (7c) + (8) <br />(10) Lagging of aggregate production, dust suppression, and concrete production use in (13) based upon the factors shown in the note for (8). Note that lagged production depletions include depletions lagged from the previous <br />SWSP periods (prior to June 2012) <br />(I I) Equal to (4) + (10). <br />(1) <br />2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5a) (5b) <br />(6) <br />(7a) (7b) (7c) <br />(8) <br />(9) <br />(10) <br />(11) <br />Net <br />Lagged Net <br />Aggre ate Production (tons) <br />Aggregate <br />Dust <br />Concrete <br />Total <br />Total Lagged <br />Net <br />Evaporation <br />Evaporation <br />Production <br />Suppression <br />Dust <br />Total Dust <br />Production <br />Production <br />Production <br />Total Lagged <br />Net Exposed <br />Evaporation <br />Volume <br />Volume <br />Crushed <br />Consumption <br />at 35th <br />Suppression at <br />Suppression <br />Consumptio <br />Depletions <br />Depletions <br />Depletions <br />Month <br />Area <br />(feet) <br />ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(Not Washed) <br />Washed <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />Iverson (ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />n (ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />(ac -ft) <br />Jun -12 <br />2630 <br />042 <br />10.97 <br />738 <br />55,000 <br />10,200 <br />1 11 <br />414 <br />1 30 <br />545 <br />0.97 <br />753 <br />9.50 <br />16.89 <br />Jul -12 <br />2630 <br />046 <br />1204 <br />8 87 <br />60,800 <br />19,900 <br />1 48 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />089 <br />2.37 <br />695 <br />15.82 <br />Aug -12 <br />2630 <br />0.41 <br />1087 <br />9.38 <br />32,700 <br />8,700 <br />0.74 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />079 <br />1 53 <br />502 <br />14.40 <br />Sep -12 <br />26.30 <br />030 <br />793 <br />8.70 <br />32,800 <br />7,200 <br />069 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />047 <br />1.16 <br />398 <br />12.68 <br />Oct -12 <br />2630 <br />019 <br />5.12 <br />734 <br />32,000 <br />8,000 <br />071 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />054 <br />1 25 <br />3.34 <br />10.67 <br />Nov -12 <br />2630 <br />010 <br />269 <br />576 <br />29,400 <br />7,350 <br />065 <br />1 53 <br />1 07 <br />261 <br />042 <br />3.68 <br />362 <br />9.38 <br />Dec -12 <br />2630 <br />008 <br />2.10 <br />4.59 <br />15,000 <br />0 <br />022 <br />1 53 <br />077 <br />230 <br />0.53 <br />305 <br />173 <br />8.33 <br />Jan -13 <br />26.30 <br />0.08 <br />2.16 <br />3.97 <br />23,200 <br />0 <br />0.34 <br />0.21 <br />0.77 <br />098 <br />066 <br />1 98 <br />3.23 <br />7.20 <br />Feb -13 <br />26.30 <br />O i l <br />2 81 <br />3 77 <br />15,000 <br />5,000 <br />0.37 <br />0 18 <br />092 <br />1 10 <br />0.86 <br />233 <br />2.94 <br />6.71 <br />Mar -13 <br />26.30 <br />014 <br />365 <br />3 89 <br />0 <br />0 <br />100 <br />246 <br />1 23 <br />3 68 <br />0.88 <br />456 <br />350 <br />7.39 <br />Apr -13 <br />2630 <br />022 <br />5 85 <br />4.61 <br />0 <br />0 <br />000 <br />246 <br />1 30 <br />376 <br />096 <br />4.72 <br />4.04 <br />8.64 <br />May-13 <br />26.30 <br />030 <br />1 7.79 <br />1 5.72 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0.00 <br />368 <br />1 1 30 <br />4.99 <br />1 085 <br />1 5 84 <br />1 4.57 <br />10.30 <br />Total <br />2 81 <br />7398 <br />73.98 <br />295,900 <br />66,350 <br />630 <br />1620 <br />867 <br />2487 <br />8.82 <br />40.00 <br />54.43 <br />128.41 <br />Notes: <br />(1) Equal to the maximum exposed post -1981 surface area <br />(2) Equal to Column (6) of Table 1 <br />(3) Equal to (1) x (2). <br />(4) Evaporative depletions in (3) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the parameters below Note that lagged evaporative depletions include depletions lagged from the previous SWSP periods (pr <br />Transmissrvity 120,000 gallons /day /foot <br />Specific Yield 0.2 <br />Aquifer Width. 5,000 feet <br />Distance from center of pits to river. 1,500 feet <br />(5) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM). Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not exceeded <br />(6) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from MMM Water removed with mined aggregate equals 9.6 gallons/ton (4% of total mined volume) as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120. <br />Therefore, (10) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9.6 gallons/ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre -feet <br />(7) Projected future dust suppression at the 35th Avenue Site and Iverson comes from the 35th Avenue Site and is based upon information from MMM Note that dust suppression in July, August, September, and October will <br />come from the Iverson Pit through the dewatering process (see Table 4) <br />(8) Projected future concrete production at the 35th Avenue batch plant is based upon information from MMM <br />(9) Equal to (6) + (7c) + (8) <br />(10) Lagging of aggregate production, dust suppression, and concrete production use in (13) based upon the factors shown in the note for (8). Note that lagged production depletions include depletions lagged from the previous <br />SWSP periods (prior to June 2012) <br />(I I) Equal to (4) + (10). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.