My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-17_INSPECTION - C2009087 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2012-07-17_INSPECTION - C2009087 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:03:36 PM
Creation date
7/18/2012 7:24:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/17/2012
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Peabody Sage Creek Mining LLC
Inspection Date
7/9/2012
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 9, 2012 C-2009-087/Peabody Sage Creek Mine JDM <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Embankment Damage <br /> <br />Pond 003 was holding water with a trickle discharge at the time of the inspection. The primary and emergency <br />spillways were stable with no problems noted. The embankments showed evidence of recent work with animal <br />burrow filling. No problems were noted during the inspection, with the exception of the following: <br />- Heavy houndstounge growth was observed throughout the embankment, emergency spillway, and along the <br />outlet ditch to the flume. Weed management will need to be conducted to address the heavy noxious weed <br />presence in these areas. <br />- The discharge from the pond was not flowing through the flume. A small amount of water appeared to be <br />flowing under the established flume at the time of the inspection. The flume will need to be repaired and <br />maintained according to design. <br /> <br />The upper sump was holding water at the time of the inspection. Water was discharging from the Pecoco Pond <br />into the upper sump with a small amount of discharge noted from the upper sump into ditch RC-D3. The <br />embankments of the upper sump were bare and were stable at the time of the inspection. No problems were noted <br />with the exception of the following: <br /> <br />- As with the June 2012 inspection, at the left and the right of the primary spillway CMP, the ground appeared to <br />be saturated with moisture. All other areas around the outside of the sump embankments were dry. According to <br />Scott Cowman of PSCM, mine personnel have identified this area as ground water that is percolating to the <br />surface. The location that is saturated sits below the lowest elevation of the Upper Sump; this might exclude the <br />Upper Sump as the source of the saturation of the Area. This are should be monitored to ensure instability of the <br />Upper Sump and Ditch RC-D3 is not compromised. <br /> <br />The lower sump was holding water and discharging at the time of the inspection. The embankments were stable <br />with little to no vegetation established. The lower sump has recently been redesigned with the approval of TR4. <br />The redesign work was ongoing at the time of the inspection. No problems were noted with the exception of the <br />following: <br />- The redesign of the Lower Sump required raising of the primary spillway. The additional CMP addition was <br />leaking at the seam to the old riser elevation. A boom was observed around this area to limit the amount of flow. <br />This repair was scheduled to be completed during the construction of the lower sump. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> <br />411 <br />Page of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.