My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2009087A
>
2012-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:59:40 PM
Creation date
7/12/2012 3:18:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/8/2012
Doc Name
DRAINAGE AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05.3-E2 Drainage and Sediment Control Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabody Sage Creek Mine — Drainage and Sediment Control Plan <br />Channel Slope: Channel slope is a sensitive parameter. The steeper the slope grade the <br />lower the allowable velocity. The channel slopes were determined by direct measurement <br />from the mine permit maps. <br />Channel Geometry: Existing channels (constructed prior to 2007, as part of the Seneca II <br />Mine reclamation plan) were generally evaluated assuming a triangular, or V- shaped, <br />configuration, with a 3H:1V side slope. In certain situations, several postmine channel <br />designs incorporated a trapezoidal shaped channel with a bottom width of either three (3) or <br />ten (10) feet and 4H: IV side slopes. <br />Retardance Class: The reclamation seed mixture used in the reclamation plan results in a <br />mixed grass community. Consequently, the vegetation type selected as the model input is <br />mixed grass. <br />The flow resistance varies by grass type and length. Retardance classes have been divided <br />into five (5) classes designated by A, B, C, D, and E. SCS (1979) developed guidance for <br />selection of vegetation Retardance classes and they are outlined in Table 2.05.3 -E2 -8, <br />Guide to Retardance Class Selection. <br />Under short grass conditions, the channel is more prone to being eroded than with tall grass <br />conditions. Consequently, stability is evaluated under short grass conditions. Retardance <br />classes of D and E are typically used for stability analysis of vegetated channels. <br />Tall grass conditions are used to determine channel capacity. The tall grass affords a great <br />deal of resistance to channel flow as a function of stem basal area and by laying over during <br />high flows. The higher the resistance, the higher the elevation of flowing water in the <br />channel. Retardance classes of A through C (especially A and B) are used for capacity <br />analysis. SCCC used Retardance values of Class D for stability and Class B for capacity. <br />TABLE 2.05.3 -E2 -8 <br />Guide to Retardance Class Selection <br />Stand <br />Length of Ve etation in. <br />Retardance Class <br />Good <br />>30 <br />A <br />11 -24 <br />B <br />6 -10 <br />C <br />2 -6 <br />D <br /><2 <br />E <br />Fair <br />>30 <br />B <br />11 -24 <br />C <br />6 -10 <br />D <br />2 -6 <br />D <br /><2 <br />E <br />TR -01 2.05.3 -E2.18 Revised 04/12 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.