Laserfiche WebLink
Al2Z Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Silver Star Resources, LLC <br />L92784-01 WG317138 Manganese, dissolved M200.7 ICP <br />WG317213 Chloride SM4500CI -E <br />WG317289 Cyanide, total M335.4 - Colorimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />WG317287 Cyanide, WAD SM4500 -CN I- Cdorimetricw/ <br />distillation <br />WG317248 Fluoride SM450OF -C <br />WG317374 Nitrate/Nitnte as N M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved <br />WG316982 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />WG316967 Residue, Non-Fikerade (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />WG317343 Sulfate D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />L92784-02 WG317138 <br />WG317213 <br />WG317289 <br />WG317287 <br />WG317248 <br />WG317374 <br />WG316982 <br />Manganese, dissolved <br />Chloride <br />Cyanide, total <br />Cyanide, WAD <br />Fluoride <br />Nitrate/Nitrite as N <br />Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M200.7 ICP <br />SM4500CI -E <br />M335.4 - Colod metric w/ <br />distillation <br />M335.4 - Colod metric w/ <br />distillation <br />SM4500 -CN I- Cdorimetricw/ <br />distillation <br />SM450OF -C <br />M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Add <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Add <br />WG316967 Residue, Non- Fiherable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />WG317343 Sulfate D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />ACZ Project ID: L92784 <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte <br />concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike <br />level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS <br />or LFB) was acceptable. <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte <br />concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike <br />level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS <br />or LFB) was acceptable. <br />Page 28 of 37 <br />