My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981033 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981033
>
2012-05-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981033 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:57:33 PM
Creation date
6/27/2012 12:59:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/11/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />2.05.6(6) <br />Shale overburden <br />H = 3h(100) /SS <br />H = 3(12)(100)/33 <br />H = 109 feet <br />h - mining height (12 feet) <br />8S - percent free swell (338) <br />The new Bear No. 3 Mine plan limits mining activities to an <br />overburden thickness of 110 feet and greater. Therefore, it is <br />unlikely that chimney collapse will penetrate to the surface above <br />the mine workings. <br />Gray, Bruhn and Truka (1977) physically documented the height of <br />collapse chimney subsidence above the Pittsburgh Seam for 127 <br />cases. Gray, et. al. reported chimney subsidence height without <br />respect to the actual mining height or the lithology. Six of the <br />127 cases breached the ground surface 110 feet above the Pittsburgh <br />Seam. Table 13 presents the relative cumulative frequency <br />distribution for their data. Gray's (1977) chimney data from the <br />Pittsburgh Seam indicates that a chimney has a minor, approximately <br />4.7 percent, potential to penetrate the 110 foot overburden limit <br />in the Bear No. 3 Mine. <br />Trough Subsidence Prediction <br />Panel retreat mining, pillar robbing, as planned for the Bear No. <br />3 Mine is anticipated to cause surface subsidence in magnitudes <br />similar to that predicted by both the RMG and GW models. Table 14, <br />shows the subsidence magnitudes predicted by these models as <br />compared to the Operator's subsidence monitoring data. Considering <br />the various factors that influence subsidence; overburden <br />composition, percent extraction, barrier pillar size and location <br />and panel orientation, the subsidence values predicted by the RMG <br />and GW models are considered good. The worst case subsidence <br />prediction by the models was 6.4 feet. <br />It is anticipated that the maximum values of subsidence and tensile <br />ground strain will occur near the panels that border the outcrop <br />barrier pillar in the northwest portion of the proposed new mine <br />plan. <br />Subsidence Monitoring The Operator has monitored 13 subsidence <br />monitoring stations above the Bear No. 3 Mine since 1985. <br />2.05 -60 <br />Rev. 11 -30 -93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.