My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981033 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981033
>
2012-05-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981033 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:57:33 PM
Creation date
6/27/2012 12:59:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/11/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.05.6(6) <br />the ground surface. This gradual failure of pillars and surface <br />movement which is planned at the Bear No. 3 Mine will be measurable <br />but probably not noticeable at the ground surface. <br />• <br />Prediction of chimney collapse above mine openings in the Bear No. <br />3 Mine is important because a chimney collapse has the potential to <br />breach the surface, possibly reactivating an old land slide or <br />capturing streams or springs if it should occur directly underneath <br />such a surface feature. Prediction of trough subsidence is <br />important because the tensile strains in the overlying strata that <br />would follow pillar collapse will lower the surface topography <br />possibly reactivating landslides and capturing streams or springs <br />on the surface. <br />Chimney Collapse Prediction <br />Piggott and Eynon (1977) presented a mathematical method of <br />predicting the height of chimney development based on the mining <br />height and the percent free swell of the collapsing roof rock. The <br />Bear No. 3 Mine mains are presently being mined at a eight to ten <br />foot mining height. This prediction will assume a maximum possible <br />twelve foot mining height. If twelve feet of coal is extracted <br />from the B -seam and the overburden is entirely sandstone, 67 <br />percent swell, the maximum height of potential conical, worst -case, <br />chimney collapse would be approximately 54 feet. If twelve feet of <br />B -Seam coal is extracted and the entire overburden is shale, 33 <br />percent swell, the maximum height of conical, worst -case, chimney <br />collapse is approximately 109 feet. <br />Conservative application of Piggot and Eynon's (1977) worst -case <br />conical chimney height prediction method indicates that even a <br />worst -case conical chimney collapse should not breach the 110 foot <br />minimum overburden limit adopted by the Operator for the Bear No. <br />3 Mine. <br />Conical chimney collapse height (H) Piggot and Eynon (1977) <br />Sandstone overburden <br />H = 3h(100) /%S h - mining height (12 feet) <br />H = 3(12)(100)/67 %S - percent free swell (67 %) <br />H = 54 feet <br />2.05 -59 Rev. 11 -30 -93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.