My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (275)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (275)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 11:28:02 AM
Creation date
6/22/2012 10:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Upper Colorado Plant Center Calamagrostis Project
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Calculating on a weight basis: <br /> 30 PLS seeds/ft of row <br /> 470 feet/row <br /> 1 pound of Calamagrostis/ 669,650 seeds <br /> PLS factor of 0.15 <br /> 454 grams/pound <br /> 30 PLS seeds/ ft of row (470 feet/row) (1 pound of Calamagrostis/ 669,650 seeds) <br /> (454 grams/pound) divided by 0.15 PLS = 64 grams per row <br /> RESULTS <br /> As of today's date, May 20, 1999, there appears to be no emergence from any of the four <br /> plantings of the Calamagrostis. Considering the relatively good germination results which <br /> were obtained from greenhouse trials and from the Colorado Seed Lab (see attached <br /> report), actual field emergence results are very disappointing. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The size of Calamagrostis purpurascens seed and its fluffy characteristics make it a <br /> challenge to work with as far as mechanical application is concerned. The particular seed <br /> lot which was collected and cleaned had good germination in greenhouse trials performed <br /> by the UCEPC and from results provided by the Colorado Seed Lab. However, <br /> conventional planting and establishment methods appear to have had little or no success in <br /> seed emergence. Although the months of April and May have been cool, if no <br /> establishment success is identified by the second week of June, the project will be <br /> terminated. <br /> If an additional planting is done, I recommend a surface or near surface seeding <br /> application followed with light harrowing and possible mulching. This seed bed should <br /> then be watered almost continuously for 7-10 days such that no dry down occurs on the <br /> soil surface. This should promote emergence of any seed which is viable and has no <br /> dormancy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.