My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (259)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (259)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 11:02:34 AM
Creation date
6/21/2012 10:22:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Transfer of Permit SO1
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2 - Hydrology Review <br /> I. Due to the complexity and length of record of data available <br /> for the mine site, the Division requires a further reduction and <br /> analysis of water sampling data for the mine. The ultimate <br /> purpose is to provide a form where trends developed at the mine <br /> can be identified and used by the operator to accomplish a revision <br /> and updating of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of <br /> the permit application. Specifically, the Division requires the <br /> following data or reductions: <br /> 1. The mine discharge data should be plotted with TDS <br /> versus pumpage rates for each mine in order to allow for a <br /> depiction of TDS versus flow rate and develop a worst case loading <br /> on Coal Creek during a Q, 7-10 low flow event. The data for the <br /> 1984 year to date should be graphed. This graphing should be <br /> continued in each annual hydrologic report. See graphs, Attachment <br /> #1. <br /> 2 . For the surface water monitoring sites, graphs should <br /> be developed depicting flow, TSS, TDS, and iron as originally <br /> accomplished in the permit application, Volume 5 , Appendix III-E- <br /> 5. See graphs, Attachment #2. <br /> 3 . The map depicting monitoring sites and NPDES pond <br /> effluent points should be updated to include the mine discharge <br /> points. See Exhibit ZV-C-1 and Exhibits II-B-2 a, b & c. <br /> 4 . For ground water monitoring sites, graphs should be <br /> developed showing relationship of water level versus TDS , sulfate <br /> and, iron for the period of record. See graphs , Attachment #3 . <br /> 5. The ground water quality tables as submitted February <br /> 14 , 1986 should include water level along with chemistry. See <br /> charts , Attachment #4 . <br /> II. The hydrology section of the permit application requires <br /> updating to include a narrative describing a detailed Probable <br /> Hydrologic Consequences of mining at the Coal Basin Mines. A <br /> description of the following trends and possible impacts should <br /> address: <br /> 1. Localized effects in each tributary to Coal Creek <br /> 2 . Effects on Coal Creek <br /> 3 . Effects on Crystal River <br /> 4 . Effects on alluvial bodies and their interplay with the <br /> surface regime. (Updated discussions included in Findings Document. ) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.