My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (244)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (244)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:33:27 AM
Creation date
6/20/2012 2:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Old Refuse Pile Design Reports
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LABORATORY TESTING, PROGRA'-1 <br /> For purposes of laboratory tcsting, <br /> representative samples of the materials a`fecting slope stability <br /> were obtained in the field . Basically, only two materials warranted <br /> consideration : the excavated shale from. which the fill will be <br /> built, and the native material which the fill will be constructed . <br /> Shale samples were obtained from stockpiles of material_ previously <br /> excavated, while samples of the native material were obtained from <br /> test pits . <br /> A standard Proctor test with rock <br /> correction (MT1.1 D-698) was perforrr.ed on the shale cr:aterial, in <br /> order to deter,cine the maximum Proctor density and provide a <br /> curve for moisture-density relation. This test indicated a n:a;ci- <br /> mum. density of 131 . 2 pcf at 8. 8/ moisture. The moisture-densi''y <br /> relation curve is pr_ov�dcd with this report (Plate 2 ) . <br /> For the shale fill, it was felt that <br /> UP <br /> triaxial shear strength testing would provide the best information, <br /> since the compacted fill will probably behave as a clay. There- <br /> fore, the triaxial test was selected as preferable to the direct <br /> sheer: test, for purposes of deter:r:ini.ng co'_ esion and friction angle. <br /> Since the fill will be provided with drainage ditches upslope and <br /> at the toe, will maintain a positive gradient at all points, and <br /> is underlain by a relatively permeable strata, it- is unlikely '.:hat <br /> the fill itself will ever become sat0rated. Therefore, it was felt <br /> that a total-stress approach would be appropriate, and that an un- <br /> consolidated, undrained (UU) triaxial test would provide realistic <br /> information. <br /> The triaxial tests were performed using <br /> AOINI <br /> tj 1. 5 inch diameter remolded samples, which were remolded at approxi- <br /> mately 90;, of the maximum; standard Proctor density for the shale. <br /> This was done in order to simulate the strength cliaracteristics <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.