My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (253)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (253)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:53:38 AM
Creation date
6/20/2012 10:05:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1994 Correspondence
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steve also said that his revised plans were reviewed technically <br /> prior to the contractor ' s meeting on the site. I asked him who <br /> reviewed them and he would not tell me. I was also very disturbed <br /> about the tone of Steve' s answers, as if everyone at Mid-Continent <br /> were a bunch of bungling idiots who are completely out of touch. <br /> Mike, I can tell you that if I thought that Mid-Continent was <br /> deliberately trying to avoid reclamation or do something wrong, I <br /> would sever my relationship with them in a second. As an interested <br /> party, they would like to know what work is planned and what it <br /> will cost. I do not think this is unreasonable. <br /> I have worked with almost everyone at the Division for 14 years and <br /> never had a problem getting along with anyone. I do not know why I <br /> have a problem with one person now. <br /> Since Steve will not give me the answers to my questions, I request <br /> the following under the Freedom of Information Act: <br /> 1 ) a list of those bidders who responded to the RFP with a bid and <br /> what the amount of their bid was. <br /> 2) who was awarded the bid and at what price. <br /> 3) 1 want to see the technical review of the Sutey Pile hydrology <br /> that Steve says was done prior to the contractor meeting. I have <br /> serious problems with the proposed plans and this review is very <br /> important to me. <br /> Call me if you want to talk to me about anything I have discussed <br /> in this letter. <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> P <br /> Gre Lewicki J <br /> Greg Lewicki and Associates <br /> cc: Susan McCannon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.