My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (234)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (234)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:17:12 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:59:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1997 Correspondence
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 2 -- <br /> United States Forest White River Sopris Ranger District <br /> Department of Service National P.O. Box 309 - <br /> Agriculture Forest Carbondale, CO 81623 <br /> (970) 963-2266 <br /> Reply: 2350 <br /> Date: August 5, 1997 <br /> Peter Martin <br /> 0102 Firehouse Road <br /> Redstone, CO 81623 <br /> Dear Peter: <br /> This is in reply to your letter of July 15th regarding the roads in Coal Basin. <br /> We recognize that Coal Basin offers outstanding recreational opportunities, and <br /> are looking forward to the completion of reclamation activities. <br /> The roads in Coal Basin were built and maintained by Mid-Continent Resources <br /> for the single purpose of coal mining, and authorized by the Forest Service via <br /> special use permit. Over the last several years, both while the mine operated <br /> and after it closed, the Forest Service, Colorado Division of Wildlife, <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division, and members of the public observed <br /> that Coal Creek and its tributaries carried a large sediment load, especially <br /> after storm events. The conclusion of the experts who evaluated the situation <br /> was that a significant part of the erosion was coming from the road system. <br /> They also determined that due to the nature of the soils and topography, <br /> keeping.these roads in drivable condition would be an expensive undertaking <br /> requiring continual maintenance. Removing the culverts was specifically <br /> addressed since these structures require regular maintenance and could lead to <br /> serious erosion and flooding problems if washed out in an uncontrolled event. <br /> As part of the national effort to reduce the Federal deficit and government <br /> spending, the Forest Service has of necessity sought ways to reduce spending <br /> and maintenance obligations instead of expanding them. For these reasons, <br /> maintaining these single-purpose coal roads for public vehicular access was <br /> never addressed as a possibility. <br /> Our current Forest Plan emphasizes recreation, grazing, and wildlife within the <br /> lands of Coal Basin. It is certainly not our intent to restrict the public <br /> from using Coal Basin. In fact, my staff has spent quite a bit of time over <br /> the last several years looking for opportunities to develop a high quality <br /> trail system based on the old coal roads, following completion of mine <br /> reclamation. Among the types of uses that appear to be feasible are hiking, <br /> bicycling, horse use, motorcycling, ATV use, cross-country skiing, <br /> snowmobiling, and possibly jeep use on some road segments. Not all of the uses <br /> may be desired or approved, but I want to illustrate what we envision as the <br /> possible gamut. It will be a challenge to select and manage for a variety of <br /> uses which will be compatible with recreationists' desires and resource <br /> protection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.