Laserfiche WebLink
Task# Task Description 1991 Bond MCR King DMG Remaining Actual Cost Actual Cost Comments Comments& Backup <br /> Estimate Work Work Work Work RemainingWork <br /> 8 Backfill Prep Plant $142,129 $0 $0 $0 $142,129 $142.129 The actual costs depend on what what amount Currently,no backfilling and grading of the <br /> Area of backfilling will be done and what material prep plant area has been done. Appendix V- <br /> will be used to do the backfilling. See the E-3 of the permit states that the following <br /> discussion immediately to the right. material would be needed to return the prep <br /> plant to A.O.C: 1)64,000 tons of coal <br /> refuse, 2)50,500 cy of foundation rubble <br /> and 3) 8,700 cy of topsoil. However, on <br /> page 25 of the approved permit, a statement <br /> is made that MCR would request approval <br /> of a variance from A.O.C. for the prep plant <br /> area. Although this request was never made, <br /> I feel that the idea has good merit. Bringing <br /> coal refuse into an area that is in the historic <br /> floodplain of a drainage known for debris <br /> flows is not a good idea. Also, the <br /> relatively flat land around the prep plant is <br /> highly valuable if it is reclaimed in its <br /> current approximate contour. There would <br /> certainly be no environmental threat or <br /> degradation if the land was not restored <br /> entirely to A.O.C. Considering that this is a <br /> pre-law disturbance and the fact that <br /> language exists in the approved perrr.:t to <br /> allow for the revision, I recommend that this <br /> be pursued with the DMG. The rubble <br /> could still be used with some fill to attain a <br /> partial backfilling and blending of the slopes <br /> on the south end of the prep plant area. <br />