Laserfiche WebLink
- 10 - <br /> In a report dated October 25, 1988, Dr. Bruce Collins of Mid-Continent <br /> Resources reported that two ground cracks were discovered on Huntsman Ridge <br /> while performing the subsidence resurvey required by revision stipulation <br /> (3 ). The larger of these two cracks "extends almost without interruption for <br /> approximately 3,500 feet in length , along or closely on either side of the <br /> ridge line to the saddle between the south fork of Coal Creek and South Twin <br /> Creek". Dr. Collins presents the opinion that these cracks are the result of <br /> reactivation of an ancient slip-plane related block landslide movement. He <br /> believes that this mass movement is the result of natural processes, <br /> "primarily the greater-than-normial precipitation experienced in the period <br /> from 1981 through 1986", and that it is "related to mining only indirectly if <br /> at all ". (Excerpts from Dr. Collins October 25, 1988 letter. ) <br /> European and North American observations have documented that it is not <br /> uncommon for ground subsidence to contribute to the reactivation of landslide <br /> movement, which was one of the the reasons the Division imposed Stipulation <br /> (1 ) upon approval of the 1986 revision. The purpose of subsidence monitoring <br /> programs is to verify subsidence projections included in the permit <br /> application, in order to perfect projections so that material damage can be <br /> avoided. In the event that Mid-Continent Resources proposed an expansion of <br /> the permit area, the ability to accurately project areas of potential <br /> subsidence occurrence could be important, if structures or renewable resources <br /> were to exist within the potentially affected area. <br /> Dr. Collins requests, in his October 25 , 1988 report, that "resumption of the <br /> monitoring program be limited to annual visual inspection and reporting". He <br /> observes that no structures or renewable resource lands are in jeopardy from <br /> the ridge-line landslide. Because all of the potentially affected area lies <br /> within the existing Permit boundary and no structures or renewable resource <br /> lands are in jeopardy, the Division believes that a subsidence monitoring <br /> program limited to annual visual inspection of the potentially affected area <br /> and submission of an annual report is adequate. Mid-Continent has revised the <br /> subsidence section of the permit application to reflect the new data. <br /> In summary, the operator has now committed to conducting an annual visual <br /> inspection and reporting of any cracks, cratering, or landsliding above the <br /> mine area and also to reinstitution of the subsidence survey prior to <br /> double-pass long wall extraction. These committments are detailed on pages 36 <br /> and 37 of Chapter IV in the permit application. <br /> XXIII. Special Categories of Mining - Rules 4.27 and 4.27 <br /> This section remains valid for the existing operation. <br /> XXIV . Miscellaneous Compliance - Rules 2.05.6(5 ) , 4.02 , 4.12 , 4.19, 4.21 , <br /> 4.28 and 4.30 <br /> This section remains valid for the existing operation. <br />