My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 9:48:45 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 11:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> 5) When determining sediment storage for the ponds, only the disturbed area <br /> was considered. The sediment from the 4.4 acre undisturbed portion of the <br /> drainage area must be included. <br /> Reclamation Plan - Rule 2.05.4 <br /> 1 . Based on the recent study of revegetation on the present refuse pile, it <br /> is evident that 12 to 18 inches of topsoil is adequate to meet <br /> revegetation success standards on north and east facing slopes. However, <br /> the new refuse pile will primarily be south and west facing slopes. It is <br /> reasonable to expect that more topsoil will be required on these slopes <br /> since south and west aspects are known to be more xeric than north and <br /> east aspects. Based on the recent study, 12 to 18 inches of topsoil <br /> should be adequate for the relatively flat sections, 18 to 24 inches <br /> should be adequate for the west aspect, and 24-30 inches should be <br /> adequate for the south aspect. <br /> 2. The application must include a contingency reclamation plan, if the <br /> construction were to cease at the completion of the proposed five year <br /> configuration. This plan need not be detailed, but should present <br /> sufficient information to facilitate the necessary bonding determinations. <br /> 3. Mid-Continent must submit a detailed reclamation cost estimate similar to <br /> that doe by MLRD for the rock tunnel to wash plant conveyor system. The <br /> cost estimate must be based on volumes to be moved or removed, documented <br /> equipment production, and documented rental rates for equipment. <br /> Hydrologic Balance - Rule 2.05.6(3) <br /> 1 . The applicant should calculate the projected percent increase in total <br /> dissolved solids and soluble ions in the stream/alluvial system of Coal <br /> Creek due to the construction of the existing and proposed waste piles. <br /> These calculations should be made for impacts to water quality from each <br /> disposal site during peak, mean annual , and low flows in Coal Creek. The <br /> applicant should then assess the cumulative impacts of the two disposal <br /> piles on the quality of alluvial ground water and surface water in the <br /> steam/alluvial system of Coal Creek. <br /> 2. The applicant should also reassess the impacts that the present mines and <br /> mine facilities have on the quality and quantity of ground and surface <br /> waters in the permit and adjacent areas. This reassessment should <br /> incorporate recent as well as historic monitoring data. Where possible, <br /> graphical presentations of the data should be incorporated to summarize <br /> the data. Observed trends should be discussed. Projections of probable <br /> hydrologic impacts should be made for both surface and ground waters. <br /> Maps and Plans - Rule 2.10 <br /> 1 . Mid-Continent must update maps II-B-1 and II-B-2d of Volume 1 of the <br /> permit application to show the new permit area and the new area permitted <br /> for disturbance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.