Laserfiche WebLink
L.R. Perino f Page 11 __.jrii 27, 1993 <br /> The Division requests (p 7) consideration of the pore <br /> pressure that will be present on fractures adjacent to the <br /> bulkhead after closure, as follows, "The shear strength analysis <br /> of the wall rock should further consider the likelihood that water <br /> will be flowing through the fracture system once the hydraulic <br /> head builds up behind the bulkheads." The pore pressure developed <br /> by water being forced through the rock around a bulkhead will of <br /> necessity decrease from the mine pool pressure to atmospheric <br /> pressure, i.e. hydraulic pore pressure will decrease from the <br /> waterside to the airside of the bulkhead. <br /> Garrett and Campbell-Pitt (1961, p 1291) attempted to locate <br /> any instance of spalling of the rock immediately downstream of a <br /> high pressure bulkhead and failed. They assumed that the pressure <br /> is able to dissipate at a rate sufficient to prevent a hydraulic <br /> pressure induced blowout. Similarly, they state, "there is again <br /> no evidence of the free faces of plugs having spalled under pore <br /> water pressure. They speculated (1961, p 1287) that the concrete <br /> bulkhead compresses under the applied hydraulic pressure spread <br /> laterally in accordance with Poisson's ratio, maintaining contact <br /> with the outward movement of the radially pressurized tunnel <br /> walls. They demonstrated that this was true by inserting tap <br /> points for water in the rock-concrete contact close to the face. <br /> They state, "It is apparent that the concrete does, in fact, <br /> retain contact with the rock since the rock/concrete can be made <br /> watertight by reasonable grouting". <br /> If the highest pressure water present at the waterside of a <br /> bulkhead can be prevented from penetrating the interface between <br /> the rock and the concrete and, thereby, reduce the effective <br /> stress at that critical location it is unlikely to enter other, <br /> less adversely oriented, fractures and reduce their resistance to <br /> shearing. Loading the bulkhead must produce a significant radial <br /> stress, as calculated previously, that must be overcome for water <br /> to enter the fracture system in the rock adjacent to the bulkhead. <br /> In addition, any radial hydraulic pressure within the natural or <br /> blast induced rock fracture system is unlikely to be present on <br /> only one side of a bulkhead. Any hydraulic radial pore pressure <br /> will be resisted by the elastic compressibility of the bulkhead <br /> concrete. <br /> Finally, the statement is made in item 8, "Either way, the <br /> potential for failure through the rock mass needs to be <br /> quantified." Failure of a bulkhead during filling of the mine <br /> pool requires a failure path. The most likely path is along the <br /> rock-concrete interface. However, no bulkhead failures have been <br /> reported as the result of movement along the rock-concrete <br /> interface. The shear strength across the interface has obviously <br /> exceeded the shear stress along the interface. The same must be <br /> true for the critical section concrete punching shear strength of <br /> the concrete. The description of the only documented structural <br /> distress of a bulkhead (Garrett & Campbell-Pitt, 1961, p 1289) <br /> appears to be a description of excessive bending of a reinforced <br />