Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Robert Hagen - 2 - February 3, 1992 <br />schedule. It also provides the State with remedies should forfeiture occur, <br />or should a new permittee emerge. <br />In summary, all parties agree as to the amount of performance bond necessary. <br />All parties agree that the bond instrument may provide insufficient money to <br />perform site reclamation. No party knows what amount of deficiency may <br />exist. In recognition of this possibility, the Division entered into an <br />agreement in lieu of forfeiture. As stated above and in our December 3, 1991 <br />corresponderce, the Division will take steps to obtain deficiency funds as <br />events unfold regarding permit status. Therefore, it is evident that the MLRD <br />has been proactive in attempting to resolve this potential deficiency. <br />The MLRD requests that the Deputy Director review all pertinent documentation <br />and find that our response to Ten -Day Notice 91 -02 -244 -5 is appropriate. <br />Please contact me if you have questions or comments. <br />Steven G. Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />SGR /y j b <br />cc: Michael Long <br />Dan Mathews <br />1075F <br />