My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-24_PERMIT FILE - X201223103
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
X201223103
>
2012-05-24_PERMIT FILE - X201223103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:58:08 PM
Creation date
5/25/2012 9:26:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X201223103
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/24/2012
Doc Name
Cultural Resource Survey Form
From
Pebody Sage Creek Mining, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAG
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited - Results Archaeological Survey Form (Page 5 of 7) <br />V. LITERATURE REVIEW (cont) <br />In the general region (summarize): There are 19 recorded cultural resource sites and isolated finds <br />within the seven sections for this project. All but one (5RT2745) has been evaluated as not eligible <br />and no further work is recommended. 5RT2745 is recommended as "needs data," but the site is <br />located over a half mile from any of the core hole locations. The 1915 GLO shows several historic <br />features (cabin, road, irrigation ditch, reservoir or fence line) within the seven sections but none fall <br />within the survey boundaries for the seven drill sites. <br />26. Expected Results: Although there are previously recorded sites and isolated finds in the <br />surrounding areas, expectations were low for this project. This was due to the fact that the <br />inventoried areas are extremely small and two of the locations have been previously <br />disturbed via CPR reclamation and power line construction. <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. Identify, record, and assess any cultural resources located within the potential area of effect. <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site The locus of previous (50 year age minimum) human activity at which the <br />preponderance of evidence suggests either one -time diagnostically interpretable use or <br />repeated use over time, or multiple classes of activities. <br />IF One or more culturally modified objects not found within the context of a site as defined <br />above. These objects lack evidence of or potential for additional cultural materials or features in <br />the immediate vicinity. <br />29. Describe Survey Method: Five drill sites (CCU75, 77, 81, 83, 84 and 86) were found via <br />GPS data, while CCU31 was staked with a piece of metal rebar. For the remaining drill site <br />locales, a pin flag was placed at the center point and a 150 -ft radius around the center point was <br />surveyed in spiral transects spaced no more than 50ft (15m) apart. A total of 11.2 acres was <br />surveyed for the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.