My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (94)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (94)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 9:33:14 AM
Creation date
5/15/2012 10:21:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Coal Refuse Facility Driainage Control Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter II Attachment 5 to Appendix II-B-7 (11-B-App. 7 Att.5)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�I <br /> i <br /> The depth to the water table was between 13. 0 to 19. 0 <br /> feet below the ground surface during the field investigation <br /> in summer 1983. The water level measurement data , obtained <br /> during summer 1983, were used to develop a water table map of <br /> the study area. The water table in the outwash deposits, as <br /> indicated on Plate 1, follows the topographic surface of the <br /> area. Ground water flows southward and discharges into Coal <br /> Creek. The hydraulic gradient was approximately 0. 1 ft/ft <br /> during the time of the field investigation. <br /> The interpretation of the water table map is shown on <br /> Plate 1. <br /> Mid-Continent has been performing systematic ground <br /> water level measurements in the monitoring wells E-1 and W-1. <br /> These measurements cover the time period between July, 1983 <br /> until March , 1984. They are presented in Table 1. It is <br /> evident that the ground water fluctuations are considerable. <br /> Generally, ground water levels are much higher during this <br /> time (March, 1984) than during the time of the ground water <br /> investigation. <br /> 5. 3 Horizontal Extent of Ground Water <br /> The horizontal extent of ground water in the outwash <br /> deposits has been interpreted on Plate 1 as coinciding with <br /> the width of both east and west valleys. No attempt has been <br /> made to interpret the width of ground water farther north of <br /> the proposed site , but it can be reasonably assumed that it <br /> will coincide with the width of the valley. <br /> 5. 4 Permeability <br /> The hydraulic conductivity of the outwash deposits was <br /> measured directly in the field. Field permeability tests were <br /> performed in both types of the outwash deposits, in silty <br /> clays and underlying clayey gravel. Results of field testing <br /> indicated that both types of the material have a low per- <br /> meability in the range between 2.4 x 10-6 and 4.1 x 10-5 <br /> cm/sec. Due to the almost identical permeability of both <br /> layers, the silty clay stratum is not considered to be a con- <br /> fining bed, and the water bearing layer is under water table, <br /> or unconfined conditions. Results of field permeability test- <br /> ing are supported by three laboratory testin�q results whic <br /> gave permeabilities ranging from 1.3 x 10- to 2.5 x 10- <br /> cm/sec. <br /> It was not considered to be practical to perform a <br /> pumping test in materials with such low permeability. We cal- <br /> culated that a four inch well would yield only ?pproximately <br /> 0. 16 gpm. Results of pumping tests with such a low yield are <br /> 17 <br /> GEO-HYDRO CONSULTING.INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.