My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (107)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (107)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 12:39:59 AM
Creation date
5/15/2012 9:23:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
New Coal Refuse Disposal Facility
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter II Appendix II-B-5 (Part 2 of 2)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` STATE OF COLORADO <br /> Roy Romer, Governor <br /> 187E `wVNt�-n (� /tea <br /> DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1lL <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br /> May 13, 1987 <br /> Mr. Doug Bowman <br /> Environmental Coordinator <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> Box 158 <br /> Carbondale, Colorado 81623 <br /> Re: TR-08; Sutey Expansion, File No. C-81-017 <br /> Dear Mr. Bowman: <br /> I have completed my review of TR-08 for adequacy. Specific deficiencies are <br /> noted below and in the enclosed memo from Jeff Deckler. <br /> Map 2 of 2 does not show the location of the intake for the new sediment pond <br /> as shown on Map 1 of 2. <br /> Are cutoff collars to be utilized for the new sediment pond and, if so, what <br /> will be the spacing? <br /> I was interested to note the snow runoff index used in the USLE. Could you <br /> supply a reference for this index. <br /> From Map 2 of 2 it appears that only areas I, II, IV and V would flow to the <br /> new sediment pond and the west collection ditch. All other areas appear to <br /> flow to the east ditch and to the two existing ponds. Please clarify why the <br /> new pond was designed to hold all the runoff. The capacity of the existing <br /> ponds will need to be evaluated if part of the new acreage, as shown on Map 2 <br /> of 2, drain to these ponds. The east collection ditch will also need to be <br /> evaluated for adequacy of size if increased acreage is to drain to it. <br /> For the Phase I, 1987 Pond calculations, Map 1 of 2 should have the drainage <br /> areas labeled. The disturbed acreage given as 9.2 acres does not agree with <br /> Division estimates of greater than 12 acres. The acreages need to be <br /> verified. As noted previously, if the pile configuration of Map 2 of 2 is <br /> followed, some areas of Phase I, 1987 appear to drain to the existing sediment <br /> ponds. Therefore, the adequacy of these ponds would need to be evaluated. <br /> If you have any ouestions, please contact me. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Candace M. Thompson <br /> Wdrologist <br /> CMT/7pj h 99 <br /> 942 FCentennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.