My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-02-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-02-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2021 2:32:39 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:24:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/2/1998
Doc Name
Initial Interrogatories Propounded to 3rd Party
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
included for road cut-slopes and 7.4 acres are included for road fill slopes. Many of the <br /> roads slopes surveyed in this report have stabilized and revegetated. Please state wheyher <br /> the acreages in the Geo-Hydro Report are part of the original reclamation plan, whether <br /> they are vegetated, and whether a revegetation efforts on these areas has a reasonable <br /> chance for success. Please state upon what this opinion is based. Are there documents <br /> relating to either this opinion(s)? If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your <br /> responses to these interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these documents <br /> may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 46. As we read the DMG' Reclamation Accounting, it appears DMG <br /> contemplates performing "mine maintenance'. Please states what this includes and why <br /> it is believed to be necessary. Please explain what work has been or is proposed for this <br /> reclamation feature by location, component and cost,where in the approved Reclamation <br /> Plan this work is the responsibility of MCR and where this is covered in the Reclamation <br /> Bond? If this work is not covered by the approved Reclamation Plan,what is the authority <br /> for it? Are there documents relating to either this reclamation feature? If so, please attach <br /> a copy of such documents to your responses to these interrogatories or state the <br /> circumstances under which these documents may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 47. In connection with the foregoing mine bench outslope revegetation,is there <br /> any document to support the success of this revegetation effort?If so,please attach a copy <br /> of the cost documents to your responses to these interrogatories or state the circumstances <br /> under which such documents may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 48. In connection with the seed bid referred to in the DMG Reclamation <br /> Accounting for reseeding and revegetating in Coal Basin,is there a specified mix for what <br /> was bid? Does this bid mix coincide with the mix that was approved in 1994 for the entire <br /> site?Are there documents relating to these costs? If so,please attach a copy of the mix,bid <br /> and cost documents to your responses to,these interrogatories or state the circumstances <br /> under which these documents may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 49. In connection with the foregoing seed bid, is this bid in addition to the <br /> revegetation costs for the mine benches, road surfaces and road cuts/fills? Are there <br /> documents relating to these costs? If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your <br /> responses to these interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these documents <br /> may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 50. If we read the DMG Reclamation Accounting correctly, it appears that all <br /> costs for revegetation(including tree purchase and plant)adds up to$457,000.Yet the costs <br /> per acre to perform this work is significantly higher. Would you please explain this <br /> discrepancy?Are there documents relating to these costs?If so,please attach a copy of such <br /> documents to your responses to these interrogatories or state the circumstances under <br /> INITIAL INTERROGATORIES <br /> CIVIL NO.97 cv 131-3 -15- PROPOLTN�DED TO DMG BY MCR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.