Laserfiche WebLink
40. In connection with the Sutey refuse pile (located northerly and westerly of <br /> the Coal Preparation Plant in Section 10,T. 10 S.,R.89 W.,6"'P.M.,see attached USGS Quad <br /> Sheet Placita, Colo. segment), please describe the work that remains in connection with <br /> Ditch #8 at the Sutey refuse pile. Are there documents describing this work and its costs. <br /> If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your responses to these interrogatories or <br /> state the circumstances under which these documents may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 41. In connection with the area near the original coal refuse pile (located <br /> adjacent to the bathhouse and south and easterly of the Coal Preparation Plant,distinctive <br /> from the Sutey refuse pile, see attached USGS Quad Sheet Placita, Colo. segment), please <br /> describe the proposed or contemplated work for the"channel" in this area. Please explain <br /> what work has been or is proposed for the channel" by location, component and cost, <br /> where in the approved Reclamation Plan that the this work is the responsibility of MCR <br /> and where this is covered in the Reclamation Bond? If this work is not contained in the <br /> approved Reclamation Plan,what is the authority for it? Are there documents relating to <br /> these costs? If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your responses to these <br /> interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these documents may be inspected <br /> and/or copied. <br /> 42. Are there documents,maps or drawings,relating to the"channel"in the area <br /> of the Coal Preparation Plant/bathhouse? If so,please attach a copy of such documents to <br /> your responses to these interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these <br /> documents may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> 43. Are there documents relating to the revegetation of the original coal refuse <br /> pile? If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your responses to these <br /> interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these documents may be inspected <br /> and/or copied. <br /> 44. If we read the DMG Reclamation Accounting correctly, it appears DMG <br /> proposes to spend $124,421 to revegetate mine bench outslopes at high elevations, with <br /> severe angles of repose,containing principally Mancos shale,and with little,if any,topsoil. <br /> Please explain what work has been or is proposed for this revegetation feature by location, <br /> component and cost, where in the approved Reclamation Plan this work is the <br /> responsibility of MCR and where this is covered in the Reclamation Bond? If this work is <br /> not covered by the approved Reclamation Bond, what is the authority for it? Are there <br /> documents relating to either these costs or reseeding at such elevation and under such <br /> conditions? If so, please attach a copy of such documents to your responses to these <br /> interrogatories or state the circumstances under which these documents may be inspected <br /> and/or copied. <br /> 45. In the Geo-Hydro Report of 1983 predicating the initial permit,6.9 acres are <br /> INITIAL INTERROGATORIES <br /> CIVIL NO.97 cV 131-3 -14- PROPOUNDED TO DMG BY MCR <br />