Laserfiche WebLink
Response: The Defendants' definition of "MLRB <br />Reclamation Bond" is "the security and /or pledge posted by Mid - <br />Continent Resources, Inc. pursuant to the Mid -Term Review in <br />connection with the MLRB Reclamation Permit." Mid - Continent <br />Resources posted as security a first lien on a piece of real <br />property. This security and /or pledge does not contain cost <br />categories, thus a comparison to the cost categories in the <br />Lewicki Report cannot be made. <br />3. Do you agree that the column entitled "1991 Bond <br />Estimate" accurately sets forth the cost allocations with an <br />aggregate total of $2,992,963 set forth in the MLRB Reclamation <br />Bond? If not, please explain any differences. <br />Response: See Response to Interrogatory 2. <br />4. Do you agree that the cost allocation under the <br />column entitled "MCR work" is equal to or less than the allocated <br />value of such work under the MLRB Reclamation Bond? If not, <br />please explain any differences. <br />Response: See Response to Interrogatory 2. <br />5. Do you agree that the amount set forth in the <br />column entitled "King Work" is equal to or less than the <br />allocated value of such work to be performed by the salvage <br />contractor under the MLRB Reclamation Bond? If not, please <br />explain any differences. <br />Response: See Response to Interrogatory 2. <br />6. Do you agree that the amount set forth under the <br />column captioned "DMG Work" shows an accurate allocation of costs <br />under the MLRB Reclamation Bond? If not, please explain any <br />differences. <br />Response: See Response to Interrogatory 2. <br />7. Do you agree that the amount set forth under the <br />column entitled "Remaining Work" accurately sets forth the cost <br />allocations under the MLRB Reclamation Bond? If not, please <br />explain any differences. <br />3 <br />