My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-03-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-03-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2021 10:10:39 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/12/1998
Doc Name
3rd party defendant's answers to initial interrogatories
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pond embankments and ripped road beds are some areas which <br /> would likely be sampled. <br /> Documents pertaining to this interrogatory will be made <br /> available for inspection at a mutually convenient time at the <br /> Division' s offices in Denver and\or Grand Junction. <br /> 52 . In the DMG Reclamation Accounting under the <br /> caption "Contaminated Soils Identification and Disposal" <br /> certain costs are proposed, please identify these areas and <br /> the suspected problem. Please explain what work has been or <br /> is proposed for this soil problem by location, component and <br /> cost, where in the approved Reclamation Plan this work is the <br /> responsibility of MCR and where this covered in the <br /> Reclamation Bond? If this work is not covered by the approval <br /> Reclamation Bond, what is the authority for it? Are there <br /> documents relating to these costs? If so, please attach a copy <br /> of such documents to your responses to these interrogatories <br /> or state the circumstances under which these documents may be <br /> inspected and/or copied. <br /> Response: The area where a problem may exist is bounded <br /> on the east by the Dutch Creek Flume, on the south by the <br /> remnants of the District Office, on the west by Road A and on <br /> the north by the north edge of the facilities area bench <br /> immediately above Coal Creek. <br /> The concern is that MCR' s contractor, Harlan and <br /> Associates, has identified soils containing concentrations of <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons significantly above the State of <br /> Colorado' s Remedial Action Criteria for Categories, I, II, <br /> III . The August 2, 1996 Harlan and Associates Memorandum <br /> recommends excavation of the petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contaminated soil and disposal of this material at a licensed, <br /> off-site facility. <br /> It is the Division' s understanding that MCR is responsible <br /> for complying with applicable laws concerning any contaminants <br /> found at the site. It is also the Division' s understanding <br /> that funds allocated in the Environmental Account under MCR' s <br /> liquidation plan have been spent . It is foreseeable based on <br /> conditions discovered at the site and the Harlan report that <br /> the Division during reclamation may encounter contaminated <br /> soil . The Division' s Accounting therefore covers the <br /> estimated costs of addressing soil contamination. If more <br /> 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.