My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-03-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-03-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2021 10:10:39 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/12/1998
Doc Name
3rd party defendant's answers to initial interrogatories
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to these interrogatories or state the circumstances under <br /> which this these items may be inspected and/or copied. <br /> Response: Many of these documents have been previously <br /> provided to representatives of Mid-Continent Resources . If <br /> any document cannot be located, it will be made available for <br /> inspection at a mutually convenient time at the Division' s <br /> offices in Grand Junction and\or Denver. <br /> 25 . If we read the DMG Reclamation Accounting <br /> correctly, it appears $414, 458 is projected for expenditure at <br /> mine portal areas . Please state what this expenditure is for <br /> by location, item and cost component . Are there documents <br /> relating to this cost? If so, please attach a copy of such <br /> document to your responses to these interrogatories or state <br /> the circumstances under which these documents may be inspected <br /> and/or copied. <br /> Response: Objection: This interrogatory is unclear and <br /> vague . The Division can not determine how your figure of <br /> $414, 458 was generated or what is specifically included in <br /> that figure. The Division is therefore unable to respond to <br /> this interrogatory. <br /> 26 . Please state what, if any, topsoil or other <br /> substitute material has been placed on the backfilled mine <br /> portal areas . If none, please state upon what publications or <br /> other authority you rely in your revegetation expectation. <br /> Please state what your expectations are for revegetation <br /> success at these areas and upon what publication or authority <br /> this expectation relies . <br /> Response: Topsoil has not been utilized at the <br /> backfilled mine portals, because little if any is available . <br /> In some cases, organic amendments have been incorporated into <br /> the fill material to initiate the soil building process . <br /> The Division has observed that this technique has been <br /> successful at an Abandoned Mined Land Project in Coal Basin. <br /> Pertinent documents relative to revegetation success <br /> expectations include : <br /> - Undated Intermountain Soils, Inc . Report contained in <br /> Volume 8, Chapter V of the Mid-Continent Resources permit <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.