My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-09-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-09-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:14:30 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:23:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/30/1998
Doc Name
Answer to amended 3rd party complaint
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19. The Division admits that the liquidation plan refers to reclamation of the Coal <br /> Basin mine site and states that the plan speaks for itself. <br /> 20. The Division admits the allegations contained in paragraph 20. <br /> 21. The Division admits that the liquidation plan refers to distributions to be made for <br /> reclamation purposes and states that the plan speaks for itself. To the extent that the <br /> allegations contained in paragraph 21 incorporate legal argument, no admission or denial is <br /> required. <br /> 22. The Division admits that the liquidation plan refers to "Reclamation Bond" and <br /> states that the plan speaks for itself. <br /> FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br /> (Accounting) <br /> 23. The Division incorporates all of its previous responses in this Answer as if set <br /> forth in full. <br /> 24. The Division is without sufficient information and knowledge as to the beliefs of <br /> the Third-Party Plaintiffs and accordingly denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24. <br /> 25. The Division admits the allegations of the first sentence of paragraph 25. As to <br /> the second sentence, the Division admits that it provided the requested information to the <br /> Third-Party Plaintiffs but specifically denies that the information lacks sufficient detail for <br /> the Third-Party Plaintiffs to determine the true status of funding and reclamation. <br /> 26. The Division denies the allegations of paragraph 26. <br /> SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br /> (Breach of Contract Steep Slope Vegetation) <br /> 27. The Division incorporates all of its previous reponses in the Answer as if set forth <br /> in full. <br /> 28. The Division denies the allegations of paragraph 28. <br /> 29. The Division denies the allegations of paragraph 29. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.