My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-11-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1997-11-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2021 8:45:35 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 12:37:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/3/1997
Doc Name
Case Manager Order
From
District Court County of Pitkin
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 30 '97 09:14AN PITKIN COUNTY ADNIN P.2 <br /> based upon each individual's knowledge, skill, experience <br /> training, or education. <br /> C. Plaintiffs will provide Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures on of <br /> before April 1, 1998. MCR and DMG will have untt_ <br /> May 1, 1998, to identify any rebuttal experts and provide <br /> their expert reports. <br /> MCR Experts(Disputed) <br /> 2. MCR anticipates the potential need for the following experts: <br /> it. An attorney to testify regarding the propriety of MCR's, <br /> claim(s) which Plaintiffs allege are frivolous and groundless, <br /> b. .An expert to testify concerning the standard of' care anc. <br /> duties normally imposed upon a creditors' trustee such aj, <br /> Defendant, Louis M. LaGiglia. <br /> C. MCR presently does not anticipate retaining or specially <br /> employing any other witnesses beyond (1) the foregoing and <br /> (2) those enumerated in its October 7, 1997 disclosure- <br /> statement. With regard to each of the October 7, 199'1 <br /> disclosure statement witnesses, stone is an expert "retained o� <br /> specially employed to provide expert testimony" or whose. <br /> employment duties "regularly involve giving experi- <br /> testimony" as provided by Rule 26(a)(2)(B), CoLo. R. Civ <br /> P. Information held by person(s) listed in response to Rule <br /> 26(a)(1) includes opinion based upon each witness' <br /> knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education. <br /> Dispute: DMG disputes MCR's assertion that none of it <br /> witnesses enumerated in MCR's disclosure statement is an <br /> expert "retained or specially employed to provide expert <br /> testimony" or whose employment duties "regularly involve <br /> giving expert testimony." DMG disputes this assertion as i-, <br /> pertains to Gregory C. Lewieki, P.E., a witness listed iii <br /> MCR's Rule 26(a)(1) disclosure. <br /> d. MCR will provide Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures, if any, on or <br /> before April 1, 1998. Plaintiffs and DMG will have until <br /> May 1, 1998 to identify any rebuttal experts and provide their <br /> expert reports. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.