My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-01-31_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-01-31_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2021 8:05:44 AM
Creation date
5/1/2012 10:42:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/31/1994
Doc Name
Letter Responding to Interia Site Maintenance
From
Holden & Jessop PC
To
Assistant Attorney
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cheryl A. Linden <br /> February 1, 1994 <br /> Page 3 <br /> issues may arise as a result of disturbances created by the Board's <br /> contractor, and Resources cannot take responsibility for such <br /> disturbances. <br /> Chapter 11 Plan <br /> As drafted, Resources' Chapter 11 Plan proposes to <br /> liquidate assets within a timeframe that will permit the timely <br /> performance of reclamation. The Rockdust Plant can be liquidated <br /> this Spring for an amount which will pay for most of the <br /> reclamation work that would be performed this year under any <br /> realistic reclamation schedule. <br /> The Plan also would pledge to the Board about 70% of the <br /> liquidation proceeds from other assets which are not now pledged to <br /> secure reclamation. This pledge would be up to an amount which <br /> would fully fund the reclamation bond. Later in the year, but well <br /> within the reclamation season, additional proceeds from sale of the <br /> Carbondale Industrial Park should become available, in an amount <br /> sufficient to fund reclamation well into 1995. The Plan recognizes <br /> that performance of the reclamation plan will require several <br /> years, no matter what. It appears that the Division recognizes <br /> this as well. <br /> We were advised by the Board on January 26 not only that <br /> the Plan is unacceptable, but that the Board would not even respond <br /> to the proposal. It is difficult to respond to the Board's and the <br /> Division's concerns because there is never a clear statement from <br /> either as to what would be acceptable. The Plan filed on January <br /> 18 was our attempt to respond to concerns mentioned by Mike Long at <br /> our meeting on January 10. Based on what we heard at that meeting, <br /> both Dean Massey and I believed that the new Plan would lead to a <br /> settlement with the State. Obviously we were mistaken. <br /> Based on our January 26 meeting, we assume that the <br /> Division and Board will reject the Chapter 11 Plan in its present <br /> form. We expect the Plan to go out for a vote in early February, <br /> with a voting deadline of about March 15. We suggest that the <br /> State hold off voting on the Plan until we are closer to the voting <br /> deadline, and that we use that time to see whether the Plan can be <br /> modified in a way that would make the Plan acceptable to the State. <br /> Plans may be modified at any time prior to confirmation. <br /> Despite the absence of any real negotiations, we want to <br /> comment on several matters that came up at the January 26 meeting. <br /> First, some members of the Board suggested that they might look at <br /> the Plan differently if substantial funds were made available <br /> immediately, rather than over time. Such funds do not exist from <br /> Resources, and we have been advised that such funds do not exist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.