Laserfiche WebLink
FRGf*1'': Panasonic TAD/FAX PHONE NO. 9454958 Mar. 07 1994 11:29AM P03 <br /> Cheryl A. Linden <br /> March 2, 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> exist the State needs to deal with the situation as it exists. <br /> Resources' assets are worth what they are worth. If, the Plan is <br /> confirmed and Resources' assets turn out to be unmarketable, the <br /> State will be free to pursue other remedies, if any, including the <br /> pending litigation against so-called "agents" of the mining <br /> permittee. If the assets turn out to have considerable value, as <br /> Resources believes, the dividend for the State will be sufficient <br /> to fund the approved reclamation plan. <br /> On the, other hand, if Plan confirmatiQz,J.U-.blocked by the <br /> State, it is foreseeable that the case will be dismissed. It is <br /> likely that Sanwa then will foreclose its senior liens on <br /> Resources' equipment and certain real estate, including the <br /> Carbondale Industrial Park. Sanwa thus would realize. value which <br /> under the Plan would have gone to the State. Other assets would be <br /> likely to remain in limbo for years to come. Denial of <br /> confirmation thus is contrary to the State's interests. <br /> Denial of confirmation also is contrary to the State's <br /> interests in the litigation against the so-called "agents. " While <br /> the State's position is that the liability of the "agents" is joint <br /> and several with the mining permittee, the defendant's view, as I <br /> understand it, is that the mining permittee is responsible for <br /> carrying out reclamation. In February, the DMG's own hearing <br /> officer found that Resources is "contemporaneously reclaiming" the <br /> mine site, and that the current reclamation schedule needs to be <br /> "realistically adjusted. " The Chapter 11 Plan provides funds <br /> sufficient to carry out the approved reclamation plan according to <br /> a realistically adjusted schedule. <br /> If the State spurns the funds being offered under the <br /> Plan, the defendants surely will argue that the State has failed to <br /> mitigate damages. I would go beyond that and argue that in an <br /> equitable proceeding, the State is not entitled to create a problem <br /> by blocking efforts of the mining permittee to reclaim its mine, <br /> and then to require the permittee's "agents" to fix the problem <br /> created by the State's own action. <br /> Turning to the efforts to sell certain assets, we now <br /> anticipate filing a- motion to sell the equipment and structures at <br /> the Rockdust Plant to Pete Lien for $300,000, and the real property <br /> to Mid-Valley Design for $200,000. The second offer exceeds the <br /> offer from Dale Eubank which I discussed with you several days ago. <br /> Both offers are cash offers payable upon closing as soon as <br /> Bankruptcy Court approval is obtained. I hope to file the sale <br /> motion with the Bankruptcy Court tomorrow. <br />