Laserfiche WebLink
James Holden <br />July 30, 1993 <br />Page 7 <br />FAIRFIELD AND WOODS, PC. <br />ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW <br />Page 23, third full paragraph -- the second sentence should <br />refer to the Quarry and the word "is" thereafter should be changed <br />to "are." <br />Page 23, fourth full paragraph, (ii) -- the $1.5 million and <br />$250,000 should be reduced by sums spent on such activities prior <br />to funding of the Trusts. Also, shouldn't this paragraph refer to <br />use of funds in the Creditors' Trust to pay the costs of <br />administering the Creditors' Trust? Also, note the discussion of <br />Net Proceeds and the comments above about real estate taxes. <br />Page 25, first full paragraph, (ii) -- should the reference to <br />the "Effective Date" in the parentheses be instead to the date(s) <br />of funding of the $1.5 million? Also, the phrase after the end of <br />the parentheses is duplicative and should be omitted. Also, (iii) <br />should refer to the concept of a credit on the $250,000 for sums <br />spent on environmental activities before funding. <br />Page 25, fourth full paragraph -- same comments about the <br />Effective Date and the phrase "and charged against the Rockdust <br />Plant." <br />Page 26, second full paragraph -- add concept of credits to <br />the $250,000. <br />Page 27, second full paragraph, (ii) -- add concept of <br />charging to the Reclamation Trust any cost of assuming the Quarry <br />lease. <br />Page 27, fifth full paragraph -- is a 30 day period enough? <br />Page 33, paragraph 2.a. -- would it better say "More than <br />fifty percent of the number of creditors holding allowed .... "? <br />I have usually sent W -9 forms to creditors with ballots. Have <br />you determined that you don't need to do that here? <br />What happened to the idea of buying the tax certificates at a <br />discount? <br />When changes are made to the Plan and Disclosure Statement, <br />will you please "redline" them? <br />