My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (53)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (53)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 4:38:45 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 2:07:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/29/1988
Doc Name
Soil Baseline Study Nucla East Study Area
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 9 Attachment 9-5
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 9-5-2 <br /> Criteria for Evaluating Soil Suitability <br /> Parameter-Units Threshold Suitability Level1 <br /> pH Lift 12 <6.1- >7.8 <br /> Lift 2 <5.0, >8.4-8.9 <br /> Conductivity (mmhos/cm) Lift 1 >4.0 <br /> 3 Lift 2 >4.0-12.0 <br /> Saturation percentage (%) >80% <br /> <25% <br /> Sodium adsorption ratio Lift 1 >4 <br /> Lift 2 >10-14 <br /> Calcium carbonate percentage Lift 1 >15 <br /> Lift 2 >30 <br /> Selenium (ppm) >2 ppm <br /> Particle sizes All soil textures except: <br /> Lift 1 s, 1s, sc, sic, c <br /> Lift 2 s, >40-50%c <br /> Coarse fragments (%) Lift 1 >15%6 <br /> Lift 2 >35%6 <br /> 1 The threshold levels are to be used as a guide in evaluating the suitability of a soil <br /> material for reclamation. An evaluation should take into account the "total system". <br /> Interactive parameters may either nullify or verify the significance of a potential <br /> problem. <br /> 2 Specific single and double lift topsoil salvage procedures and suitability criteria will <br /> be evaluated separately by soil type (prime or non-prime farmland) and land use (premine <br /> rangeland, irrigated pastureland, and irrigated hayland or cropland). <br /> 3 The actual maximum acceptable salt level will depend on the plant species proposed in <br /> the revegetation plan and the potential for upward salt movement. <br /> 4 Specific level depends upon clay mineralogy, soil texture, and saturation percentage <br /> according to Dollhopf et al ., 1983. <br /> 5 The specific percentage of clay or sand allowed will depend upon clay mineralogy, <br /> organic matter content, consistence, soil lift, spoil characteristics, and size of sand <br /> fraction. <br /> 6 These values may vary depending upon the plant species proposed for revegetation in <br /> specific locations (e.g., a soil with a high coarse fragment content throughout its <br /> profile may be completely salvaged if used for rangeland versus cropland postmine land <br /> use). <br /> k/U U4-1 <br /> 9-5-17 Revised 08/19/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.