My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-03-20_REPORT - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1991-03-20_REPORT - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2021 10:58:44 AM
Creation date
4/19/2012 12:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/20/1991
Doc Name
1990 Annual Reclamation Report
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
About 50 to 55 tons of waste-lime was transported by covered truck from the sugar beet <br /> factory to NucLa Mine during May 1990. The lime was applied in June over the 4.1 acres of <br /> acid mine spoil using an apron-drive manure spreader. A D9L dozer with a single four foot <br /> ripper shank was used to incorporate the waste time into the spoil. The lime application <br /> rate was selected after reviewing soil reaction, acid base potential, and sulfur <br /> fractionation data presented in the 1989 Annual Topsoil Balance and Spoil Quality Report <br /> (PCC, 1990) and suitability criteria presented in Tab 6, Attachment 6-1, Table 6-1-3 of <br /> the permit. <br /> Soil Redistribution. Soil from stockpile sites 9,10, and 13 was redistributed over 13.3 <br /> acres of final graded spoil in the Pit 2 reclamation area as shown on Exhibit 1. Soil was <br /> replaced in June and October 1990 following procedures listed in Tab 21 of the permit. <br /> Soil Thickness. A 1"=400' postmine topographic map, dated October 10,1989 was used to <br /> identify sample sites, initially in the office and subsequently in the field, at which <br /> soil thickness could be measured. Sites were located in the field by compass and by <br /> controlled pacing from readily identified reference points. Soil thickness measurement <br /> sites were selected using a 200-foot sample grid. Soil thickness was measured on November <br /> 6, 1990 after the site had been disked, seeded, mulched, and crimped. A Montana <br /> Sharpshooter was used to excavate a small, shallow pilot hole through the soil layer at <br /> each sample site. The soil/spoil interface was easily identified by an abrupt color <br /> change, texture or grain size difference, change in consistency, and/or the presence of <br /> coal, shale or sandstone chips in the spoil medium. <br /> A brief soil description was prepared at each sample site. Moist color, consistence, <br /> texture, and soil thickness were recorded. <br /> Soil thickness was determined at the 14 sample sites shown on Exhibit 1. Soil thickness <br /> information for each sample site is listed in Table 1. Information pertaining to the <br /> color, texture, and consistence of soil is contained in Peabody's files and is available <br /> upon request from the Western Division office in Flagstaff, Arizona. <br /> Soil thickness ranged from 5 to 14 inches with a mean of 8 inches. This mean soil <br /> thickness is slightly greater than the mean soil depth requirement of 7 inches presented <br /> in the approved soil reconstruction plan for Permit C-81-008 (Exhibit 21-2, Postmine Soil <br /> Replacement Depths). <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.