My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-03-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1987-03-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2020 9:33:30 AM
Creation date
4/18/2012 12:22:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/10/1987
Doc Name
Application & Table Of Contents
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment 10. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> The blasting schedule will be republished in the San Miguel Forum. <br /> Comment 11. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> A waiver was submitted to the Division February 9, 1987. <br /> Comment 12. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> Peabody believes Exhibit 12-5 (Figure 1) reflects approximate original <br /> landform (Figure 2). As discussed with Division personnel , for the <br /> isolated area in question, additional cross sections perpendicular to <br /> Exhibit 12-7 cross sections were drawn to determine whether or not the <br /> average postmining profile approximated the average existing premining <br /> profile. Figure 3 is provided to show where each of the new sections A, <br /> F, and C are located in relationship to postmining Section I-I ' of <br /> Exhibit 12-7. <br /> Figure 4 shows the first new section. Although there is some change in <br /> the landform, it is very insignficant and average slope data was not <br /> calculated. Figures 5 and 6 do provide a comparison of the average pre- <br /> and postmining slopes. As can be seen, the average postmining slope is <br /> within 0.1 percent of the premining and represents little change to the <br /> existing landform. An examination of the postmining topography and <br /> operation plan maps will also support this contention. <br /> Tab 13 - Reclamation Plan <br /> Comment 1. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> Concerns of Mr. Gillis have been addressed on revised pages 13-46, 46a, <br /> 57, 64, 65 and 66. <br /> 18 Revised 03/13/87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.