Laserfiche WebLink
Comment 10. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> The blasting schedule will be republished in the San Miguel Forum. <br /> Comment 11. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> A waiver was submitted to the Division February 9, 1987. <br /> Comment 12. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> Peabody believes Exhibit 12-5 (Figure 1) reflects approximate original <br /> landform (Figure 2). As discussed with Division personnel , for the <br /> isolated area in question, additional cross sections perpendicular to <br /> Exhibit 12-7 cross sections were drawn to determine whether or not the <br /> average postmining profile approximated the average existing premining <br /> profile. Figure 3 is provided to show where each of the new sections A, <br /> F, and C are located in relationship to postmining Section I-I ' of <br /> Exhibit 12-7. <br /> Figure 4 shows the first new section. Although there is some change in <br /> the landform, it is very insignficant and average slope data was not <br /> calculated. Figures 5 and 6 do provide a comparison of the average pre- <br /> and postmining slopes. As can be seen, the average postmining slope is <br /> within 0.1 percent of the premining and represents little change to the <br /> existing landform. An examination of the postmining topography and <br /> operation plan maps will also support this contention. <br /> Tab 13 - Reclamation Plan <br /> Comment 1. <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> Concerns of Mr. Gillis have been addressed on revised pages 13-46, 46a, <br /> 57, 64, 65 and 66. <br /> 18 Revised 03/13/87 <br />