1987-03-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A

• Permit No: C1981008A
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 3/10/1987
• Doc Name: Application & Table Of Contents
• Media Type: D
• Archive: Yes

Comment 2.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the response to Geology and Geochemistry Comment No. 1.
Comment 3.
RESPONSE:
Tab 12, Page 12-41 and Tab 13, Pages 13-2, 13-3, and 13-3a were revised
to incorporate the selective handling requirements for Unit 4 as per
Technical Revision 1. Terminology utilized to describe placement
procedures for Unit 1 through 4 and Class 1 through 4 materials were
revised from the standard upper 3 feet of regraded spoil to the upper 4
feet of the reclaimed soil profile. The variable topsoil/topsoil
substitute replacement depths (6, 10 and 15 inches) are included in this
4 foot suitable material requirement.
Comment 4.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the response to Geology and Geochemistry Comment No. 3.
Tab 7___HydroloqV
Comment 1.
RESPONSE:
Peabody Coal Company has compiled responses to the concerns raised by
Mr. Renner (Nucla Permit Revision No. 1 (C-81-008) , January 16, 1987)
and Mr. Doerfer (Surface Water Adequacy Review, Permit Revision No. 1,
January 28, 1987 and Surface Water Review, 1986 Hydrologic Report, Nucla
Strip Mine, January 28, 1987) . The comments and corresponding responses
are presented on Pages 4 through 11 of this document.
Comment 2.
RESPONSE:
Peabody Coal Company's Reclamation Plan presented in Tab 13 of the Nucla
Mine Permit Revision No. 1- (Permit No. C-81-008) mentions that PCC does
not plan to irrigate any reclaimed area. The pond dewatering technique
(No. 4 on pages 7-la-11, 7-lb-14, 7-1c-14, 7-1d-15, and 7-le-11)
presented in Appendices 7-1a through 7-le of Permit Revision No. 1
3